Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps

  • Hanno Seebens (Korresp. Autor*in)
  • , Laura A. Meyerson
  • , David M. Richardson
  • , Bernd Lenzner
  • , Elena Tricarico
  • , Franck Courchamp
  • , Alla Aleksanyan
  • , Emre Keskin
  • , Hanieh Saeedi
  • , Perpetra Akite
  • , Jake M. Alexander
  • , Sarah A. Bailey
  • , Dino Biancolini
  • , Tim M. Blackburn
  • , Hans Juergen Boehmer
  • , Alejandro Bortolus
  • , Marc W. Cadotte
  • , César Capinha
  • , James T. Carlton
  • , Jo Anne Crouch
  • Curtis C. Daehler, Franz Essl, Llewellyn C. Foxcroft, Jason D. Fridley, Nicol Fuentes, Mirijam Gaertner, Bella Galil, Emili García-Berthou, Pablo García-Díaz, Sylvia Haider, Liam Heneghan, Kevin A. Hughes, Cang Hui, Ekin Kaplan, Andrew M. Liebhold, Chunlong Liu, Elizabete Marchante, Hélia Marchante, Alicia Marticorena, David W. Minter, Rodrigo A. Moreno, Wolfgang Nentwig, Aidin Niamir, Ana Novoa, Ana L. Nunes, Aníbal Pauchard, Sebataolo Rahlao, Anthony Ricciardi, James C. Russell, K. V. Sankaran, Anna Schertler, Evangelina Schwindt, Ross T. Shackleton, Daniel Simberloff, David L. Strayer, Alifereti Tawake, Marco Thines, Cristóbal Villaseñor-Parada, Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule, Viktoria Wagner, Victoria Werenkraut, Karsten Wesche, Demian A. Willette, Rafael D. Zenni, Petr Pyšek

Veröffentlichungen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelPeer Reviewed

Abstract

Biological invasions are one of the major drivers of biodiversity decline and have been shown to have far-reaching consequences for society and the economy. Preventing the introduction and spread of alien species represents the most effective solution to reducing their impacts on nature and human well-being. However, implementing effective solutions requires a good understanding of where the species are established and how biological invasions develop over time. Knowledge of the status and trends of biological invasions is thus key for guiding research efforts, informing stakeholders and policymakers, for targeted management efforts, and preparing for the future. However, information about the status and trends of alien species is scattered, patchy, and highly incomplete, making it difficult to assess. Published reports for individual regions and taxonomic groups are available, but large-scale overviews are scarce. A global assessment therefore requires a review of available knowledge with careful consideration of sampling and reporting biases. This paper provides a comprehensive global assessment of the status and trends of alien species for major taxonomic groups [Bacteria, Protozoa, Stramenopila, Alveolata, and Rhizaria (SAR), fungi, plants, and animals] for Intergovernmental Panel of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) regions. The review provides irrefutable evidence that alien species have been introduced to all regions worldwide including Antarctica and have spread to even the most remote islands. The numbers of alien species are increasing within all taxa and across all regions, and are often even accelerating. Large knowledge gaps exist, particularly for taxonomic groups other than vascular plants and vertebrates, for regions in Africa and Central Asia, and for aquatic realms. In fact, for inconspicuous species, such as Bacteria, Protozoa, and to some degree SAR and fungi, we found records for very few species and regions. Observed status and trends are thus highly influenced by research effort. More generally, it is likely that all lists for alien species of any taxonomic group and region are incomplete. The reported species numbers therefore represent minima, and we can expect additions to all lists in the near future. We identified six key challenges which need to be addressed to reduce knowledge gaps and to improve our ability to assess trends and status of biological invasions.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)2542-2583
Seitenumfang42
FachzeitschriftBiological Reviews
Jahrgang100
Ausgabenummer6
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2025

Fördermittel

We are grateful to the IPBES, whose member states requested the production of the Invasive Alien Species Assessment, approved its summary for policymakers and accepted its chapters. We are indebted to the entire expert team and to the many contributing authors, to the members of the IPBES Bureau and Multidisciplinary Expert Panel who were part of the Assessment's management committee, and to the external reviewers who generously provided their expertise through the Assessment. The assistance, guidance, and leadership from the IPBES secretariat and the technical support unit have been invaluable. We thank our host organisations for their ongoing encouragement and support. H. S. acknowledges funding by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) (grant no. 521529463). P. P. and A. No. were supported by EXPRO grant no. 19‐28807X (Czech Science Foundation) and long‐term research development project RVO 67985939 (Czech Academy of Sciences). A. No. was also supported by the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and the FSE+ (Grant No. RYC2022‐037905‐I). L. A. M. was supported by The University of Rhode Island College of Environmental Life Sciences. D. M. R. acknowledges support from the project “Mobility 2019” (CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/18_053/0017850), co‐financed by the European Social Fund (ESF, Funder DOI‐10.13039/501100004895) and the state budget of the Czech Republic through the Operational Programme Research, Development and Education, administered by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, and the DSI‐NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology. F. C. acknowledges funding by the CNRS and the AXA Research Fund Chair of Biological Invasion at University of Paris Saclay. K. A. H. was supported by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and contributes to the Scientific Committee on Antarctica Research (SCAR) Scientific Research Programme ‘Integrated Science to Inform Antarctic and Southern Ocean Conservation’ (Ant‐ICON). C. H. was supported by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF 89967). M. T. was supported by LOEWE in the framework of the Centre for Translational Biodiversity genomics (TBG) funded by the government of Hesse. P. G.‐D. was supported by project CONTAIN under the Latin American Biodiversity Programme as part of the Newton Fund (NE/S011641/1). N. F. was supported by Fondecyt No 1181688. S. A. B. was supported by Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Transport Canada. A. P. was funded by the Chilean Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID) ANID/BASAL FB210006, ANID ACT 210038 and Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (Fondecyt 1231616). E. G.‐B. was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033) and the European Union (NextGenerationEU/PRTR) through projects PID2019‐103936GB‐C21, TED2021‐129889B‐I00, and RED2022‐134338‐T. E. M. was supported by FCT ‐ Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I. P. by project reference UIDB/04004/2020 and DOI identifier 10.54499/UIDB/04004/2020 . E. S. and A. B. were partially funded by CONICET (PIP 11220210100507). J. R. S. V. is very grateful to the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for research productivity scholarship (Process 310471/2023‐0). E. T. acknowledges the support of the Project funded under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.4 ‐ Call for tender No. 3138 of 16 December 2021, rectified by Decree no. 3175 of 18 December 2021 of the Italian Ministry of University and Research funded by the European Union – NextGenerationEU; Award Number: Project code CNS 00000033, Concession Decree No. 1034 of 17 June 2022 adopted by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, CUP J83C22000870007 and B833C22002910001, Project title‘National Biodiversity Future Center ‐ NBFC’. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

ÖFOS 2012

  • 106003 Biodiversitätsforschung

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitationsweisen