Abstract
When experienced in-person, engagement with art has been associated—in a growing body of evidence—with positive outcomes in wellbeing and mental health. This
represents an exciting new field for psychology, curation, and health interventions, suggesting a widely-accessible, cost-effective, and non-pharmaceutical means of
regulating factors such as mood or anxiety. However, can similar impacts be found with online presentations? If so, this would open up positive outcomes to an evenwider population—a trend accelerating due to the current COVID-19 pandemic. Despite
its promise, this question, and the underlying mechanisms of art interventions and impacts, has largely not been explored. Participants (N = 84) were asked to engage with one of two online exhibitions from Google Arts and Culture (a Monet painting or a similarly-formatted display of Japanese culinary traditions). With just 1–2 min exposure, both improved negative mood, state-anxiety, loneliness, and wellbeing. Stepdown analysis suggested the changes can be explained primarily via negative mood, while improvements in mood correlated with aesthetic appraisals and cognitive-emotional experience of the exhibition. However, no difference was found between exhibitions.
We discuss the findings in terms of applications and targets for future research.
represents an exciting new field for psychology, curation, and health interventions, suggesting a widely-accessible, cost-effective, and non-pharmaceutical means of
regulating factors such as mood or anxiety. However, can similar impacts be found with online presentations? If so, this would open up positive outcomes to an evenwider population—a trend accelerating due to the current COVID-19 pandemic. Despite
its promise, this question, and the underlying mechanisms of art interventions and impacts, has largely not been explored. Participants (N = 84) were asked to engage with one of two online exhibitions from Google Arts and Culture (a Monet painting or a similarly-formatted display of Japanese culinary traditions). With just 1–2 min exposure, both improved negative mood, state-anxiety, loneliness, and wellbeing. Stepdown analysis suggested the changes can be explained primarily via negative mood, while improvements in mood correlated with aesthetic appraisals and cognitive-emotional experience of the exhibition. However, no difference was found between exhibitions.
We discuss the findings in terms of applications and targets for future research.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Aufsatznummer | 782033 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 1-17 |
| Seitenumfang | 17 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Frontiers in Psychology |
| Jahrgang | 13 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 30 Juni 2022 |
Fördermittel
The writing of this article was supported by a Grant to MP from the EU Horizon 2020 TRANSFORMATIONS-17-2019, Societal Challenges and the Arts (870827 \u2013 ARTIS, Art and Research on Transformations of Individuals of Society). GB was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and Max Planck Society.
ÖFOS 2012
- 501001 Allgemeine Psychologie
- 501011 Kognitionspsychologie