TY - JOUR
T1 - Changes in skin barrier function after repeated exposition to phospholipid-based surfactants and sodium dodecyl sulfate in vivo and corneocyte surface analysis by atomic force microscopy
AU - Vater, Claudia
AU - Apanovic, Alexandra
AU - Riethmüller, Christoph
AU - Litschauer, Brigitte
AU - Wolzt, Michael
AU - Valenta, Claudia
AU - Klang, Victoria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - (1) Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of pure lecithins in comparison to a conventional surfactant on skin in vivo. (2) Methods: Physiological skin parameters were evaluated at the beginning and the end of the study (day 1 and day 4) (n = 8, healthy forearm skin) with an Aquaflux®, skin-pH-Meter, Corneometer® and an Epsilon® sensor. Confocal Raman spectroscopy was employed to monitor natural moisturizing factor, urea and water content of the participants’ skin. Tape strips of treated skin sites were taken and the collected corneocytes were subjected to atomic force microscopy. Circular nano objects were counted, and dermal texture indices were determined. (3) Results: Transepidermal water loss was increased, and skin hydration was decreased after treatment with SDS and LPC80. Natural moisturizing factor and urea concentrations within the outermost 10 µm of the stratum corneum were lower than after treatment with S75 or water. Dermal texture indices of skin treated with SDS were higher than skin treated with water (control). (4) Conclusions: Results suggest very good (S75) or good (LPC80) skin-tolerability of lecithin-based surfactants in comparison to SDS and encourage further investigation.
AB - (1) Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of pure lecithins in comparison to a conventional surfactant on skin in vivo. (2) Methods: Physiological skin parameters were evaluated at the beginning and the end of the study (day 1 and day 4) (n = 8, healthy forearm skin) with an Aquaflux®, skin-pH-Meter, Corneometer® and an Epsilon® sensor. Confocal Raman spectroscopy was employed to monitor natural moisturizing factor, urea and water content of the participants’ skin. Tape strips of treated skin sites were taken and the collected corneocytes were subjected to atomic force microscopy. Circular nano objects were counted, and dermal texture indices were determined. (3) Results: Transepidermal water loss was increased, and skin hydration was decreased after treatment with SDS and LPC80. Natural moisturizing factor and urea concentrations within the outermost 10 µm of the stratum corneum were lower than after treatment with S75 or water. Dermal texture indices of skin treated with SDS were higher than skin treated with water (control). (4) Conclusions: Results suggest very good (S75) or good (LPC80) skin-tolerability of lecithin-based surfactants in comparison to SDS and encourage further investigation.
KW - CONFOCAL RAMAN
KW - DRUG-DELIVERY SYSTEMS
KW - EEMCO GUIDANCE
KW - HYDRATION
KW - MOISTURIZERS
KW - PARAMETERS
KW - PENETRATION
KW - RAMAN-SPECTROSCOPY
KW - STRATUM-CORNEUM LIPIDS
KW - TRANSEPIDERMAL WATER-LOSS
KW - atomic force microscopy
KW - corneocytes
KW - dermal texture index
KW - lecithins
KW - natural moisturizing factor
KW - phospholipids
KW - skin hydration
KW - sodium dodecyl sulfate
KW - surfactants
KW - transepidermal water loss
KW - Atomic force microscopy
KW - Dermal texture index
KW - Phospholipids
KW - Natural moisturizing factor
KW - Skin hydration
KW - Corneocytes
KW - Lecithins
KW - Surfactants
KW - Transepidermal water loss
KW - Sodium dodecyl sulfate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103909557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/pharmaceutics13040436
DO - 10.3390/pharmaceutics13040436
M3 - Article
VL - 13
JO - Pharmaceutics
JF - Pharmaceutics
SN - 1999-4923
IS - 4
M1 - 436
ER -