TY - JOUR
T1 - Computational aspects of robust optimized certainty equivalents and option pricing
AU - Bartl, Daniel
AU - Drapeau, Samuel
AU - Tangpi, Ludovic
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - Accounting for model uncertainty in risk management and option pricing leads to infinite‐dimensional optimization problems that are both analytically and numerically intractable. In this article, we study when this hurdle can be overcome for the so‐called optimized certainty equivalent (OCE) risk measure—including the average value‐at‐risk as a special case. First, we focus on the case where the uncertainty is modeled by a nonlinear expectation that penalizes distributions that are “far” in terms of optimal‐transport distance (e.g. Wasserstein distance) from a given baseline distribution. It turns out that the computation of the robust OCE reduces to a finite‐dimensional problem, which in some cases can even be solved explicitly. This principle also applies to the shortfall risk measure as well as for the pricing of European options. Further, we derive convex dual representations of the robust OCE for measurable claims without any assumptions on the set of distributions. Finally, we give conditions on the latter set under which the robust average value‐at‐risk is a tail risk measure.
AB - Accounting for model uncertainty in risk management and option pricing leads to infinite‐dimensional optimization problems that are both analytically and numerically intractable. In this article, we study when this hurdle can be overcome for the so‐called optimized certainty equivalent (OCE) risk measure—including the average value‐at‐risk as a special case. First, we focus on the case where the uncertainty is modeled by a nonlinear expectation that penalizes distributions that are “far” in terms of optimal‐transport distance (e.g. Wasserstein distance) from a given baseline distribution. It turns out that the computation of the robust OCE reduces to a finite‐dimensional problem, which in some cases can even be solved explicitly. This principle also applies to the shortfall risk measure as well as for the pricing of European options. Further, we derive convex dual representations of the robust OCE for measurable claims without any assumptions on the set of distributions. Finally, we give conditions on the latter set under which the robust average value‐at‐risk is a tail risk measure.
KW - q-fin.RM
KW - math.OC
KW - 91G80, 90B50, 60E10, 91B30
KW - robust option pricing
KW - average value-at-risk
KW - distribution uncertainty
KW - optimal transport
KW - penalization
KW - Wasserstein distance
KW - convex duality
KW - optimized certainty equivalent
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062950968&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/mafi.12203
DO - 10.1111/mafi.12203
M3 - Article
VL - 30
SP - 287
EP - 309
JO - Mathematical Finance: an international journal of mathematics, statistics and financial economics
JF - Mathematical Finance: an international journal of mathematics, statistics and financial economics
SN - 0960-1627
IS - 1
ER -