TY - JOUR
T1 - Constraints on olivine deformation from SKS shear-wave splitting beneath the southern Cascadia subduction zone back-arc
AU - Löberich, Eric
AU - Long, Maureen D.
AU - Wagner, Lara S.
AU - Qorbani, Ehsan
AU - Bokelmann, Götz
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021. The Authors.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Shear-wave splitting observations of SKS and SKKS phases have been used widely to map azimuthal anisotropy, as caused by the occurrence of olivine, to constrain the dominant directions of upper mantle deformation. While SK(K)S splitting measurements at individual seismic stations are often averaged before interpretation, it is useful to consider additional information, for example, based on the variation of splitting parameters with azimuth due to the non-vertical incidence of core-phases. These constraints in theory enable a differentiation between various types of olivine and may allow us to infer otherwise poorly known upper mantle parameters such as stress, temperature, and water content. In this study, we predict the azimuthal variation of splitting parameters for A-, C-, and E-type olivine fabrics and match them with observations from the High Lava Plains, Northwestern Basin and Range, and Western Yellowstone Snake River Plain in the Pacific Northwest US. This helps to constrain the amount of water in the upper mantle in the back-arc of the Cascadia subduction zone, known for its consistent E-W oriented seismic anisotropy, and particularly large splitting delay times. Our investigation renders the C-type olivine mechanism improbable for this location; A- and E-type fabrics match the observations, although differentiating between them is difficult. However, the agreement of the amplitude of backazimuthal variation of the fast orientation, plus the potential to explain large splitting delay times, suggest the occurrence of E-type olivine, and thus the likely presence of a moderately hydrated upper mantle beneath Cascadia's back-arc.
AB - Shear-wave splitting observations of SKS and SKKS phases have been used widely to map azimuthal anisotropy, as caused by the occurrence of olivine, to constrain the dominant directions of upper mantle deformation. While SK(K)S splitting measurements at individual seismic stations are often averaged before interpretation, it is useful to consider additional information, for example, based on the variation of splitting parameters with azimuth due to the non-vertical incidence of core-phases. These constraints in theory enable a differentiation between various types of olivine and may allow us to infer otherwise poorly known upper mantle parameters such as stress, temperature, and water content. In this study, we predict the azimuthal variation of splitting parameters for A-, C-, and E-type olivine fabrics and match them with observations from the High Lava Plains, Northwestern Basin and Range, and Western Yellowstone Snake River Plain in the Pacific Northwest US. This helps to constrain the amount of water in the upper mantle in the back-arc of the Cascadia subduction zone, known for its consistent E-W oriented seismic anisotropy, and particularly large splitting delay times. Our investigation renders the C-type olivine mechanism improbable for this location; A- and E-type fabrics match the observations, although differentiating between them is difficult. However, the agreement of the amplitude of backazimuthal variation of the fast orientation, plus the potential to explain large splitting delay times, suggest the occurrence of E-type olivine, and thus the likely presence of a moderately hydrated upper mantle beneath Cascadia's back-arc.
KW - AZIMUTHAL ANISOTROPY
KW - Cascadia subduction zone
KW - EVOLUTION
KW - LATTICE-PREFERRED ORIENTATION
KW - MANTLE FLOW BENEATH
KW - ORIGIN
KW - PACIFIC-NORTHWEST
KW - SEISMIC ANISOTROPY
KW - SNAKE RIVER PLAIN
KW - WATER
KW - WESTERN
KW - olivine fabric type
KW - seismic anisotropy
KW - shear-wave splitting
KW - upper mantle deformation
KW - water content
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119858997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2021GC010091
DO - 10.1029/2021GC010091
M3 - Article
VL - 22
JO - Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
JF - Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
SN - 1525-2027
IS - 11
M1 - e2021GC010091
ER -