@inbook{679df3482bcb4e558f48f3d74180b017,
title = "Der ungetreue Mandant. Infamie infolge der Auftragsgegenklage?",
abstract = "The conviction resulting from the actiones famosae brought infamy upon the defendant. The sources do not answer consistently whether this also applied to the corresponding actiones contrariae. In particular, the fact that two fragments from the same jurist, Ulpian, appear to contradict each other, seems surprising. Ulpian attributes an infamous effect to the actio mandati contraria in D. 3.2.6.5, but only a little later, in D. 3.2.6.7, he excludes all actiones contrariae from infamy. This article tries to resolve this antinomy",
author = "Schmatzberger, {Stefan Johannes}",
year = "2024",
language = "Deutsch",
isbn = "978-88-6056-935-6",
series = "Opuscula. Quaderni di studi romanistici",
publisher = "eum",
pages = "115--136",
editor = "Horn, {Julia-Katharina } and Verrico, {Francesco }",
booktitle = "Acta Maceratensia",
}