TY - JOUR
T1 - Distinguishing self from non-self RNA by editing-specific inosine patterns
AU - Varada, Rajagopal
AU - Leuchtenberger, Alina F.
AU - Vesely, Cornelia
AU - Kaczmarek, Beata
AU - Mansouri Khosravi, Hamid
AU - Mandl, Therese C.
AU - Milanovic, Katarina
AU - Honarmand Tamizkar, Kasra
AU - Rajendra, Vinod
AU - Senoner, Hannes
AU - Steinbichl, Linda
AU - Borojevic, Marija
AU - Sombke, Andy
AU - Schmidt, Katy
AU - Eckhard, Margret
AU - Hofacker, Ivo L.
AU - Walkley, Carl
AU - Heraud-Farlow, Jacki E E.
AU - Picardi, Ernesto
AU - Bernecky, Carrie
AU - Jantsch, Michael F F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Accession Number
WOS:001855861100001
PubMed ID
42635125
PY - 2026/9/9
Y1 - 2026/9/9
N2 - The cytoplasmic antiviral sensor MDA5 is activated by double-stranded RNAs. Endogenous double-stranded RNAs are modified by the A-to-I RNA-editing ADAR family to prevent activation of MDA5. In vivo, cytoplasmic ADAR1p150 is critically required to suppress MDA5 activation, yet the editing signature of all ADAR isoforms is strongly overlapping in mice. Further, it is not clear how A-to-I modifications in dsRNA prevent MDA5 activation. Here we show that 3′ UTRs harboring inverted repeats activate MDA5 in vitro and in cells. In vitro editing by either ADAR isoform leads to editing at overlapping hotspot regions and prevents MDA5 activation in vitro and in cells. Remarkably, only inosines introduced by RNA editing are capable of suppressing MDA5 activation, while replacing guanosines with inosines during in vitro transcription has no impact on MDA5 activation. A comparison of inosines introduced by ADAR1p150 in vitro, in cells, and in vivo suggests that a small number of A-to-I conversions may be critically required to suppress MDA5 activation. As those critical editing events are predominantly altering A:U basepairs into I:U wobble basepairs, we suggest that the helical distortion introduced by those wobble pairs may prevent MDA5 polymerization and thus downstream activation of the type I interferon response.
AB - The cytoplasmic antiviral sensor MDA5 is activated by double-stranded RNAs. Endogenous double-stranded RNAs are modified by the A-to-I RNA-editing ADAR family to prevent activation of MDA5. In vivo, cytoplasmic ADAR1p150 is critically required to suppress MDA5 activation, yet the editing signature of all ADAR isoforms is strongly overlapping in mice. Further, it is not clear how A-to-I modifications in dsRNA prevent MDA5 activation. Here we show that 3′ UTRs harboring inverted repeats activate MDA5 in vitro and in cells. In vitro editing by either ADAR isoform leads to editing at overlapping hotspot regions and prevents MDA5 activation in vitro and in cells. Remarkably, only inosines introduced by RNA editing are capable of suppressing MDA5 activation, while replacing guanosines with inosines during in vitro transcription has no impact on MDA5 activation. A comparison of inosines introduced by ADAR1p150 in vitro, in cells, and in vivo suggests that a small number of A-to-I conversions may be critically required to suppress MDA5 activation. As those critical editing events are predominantly altering A:U basepairs into I:U wobble basepairs, we suggest that the helical distortion introduced by those wobble pairs may prevent MDA5 polymerization and thus downstream activation of the type I interferon response.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105047840638
U2 - 10.1093/nar/gkag845
DO - 10.1093/nar/gkag845
M3 - Article
C2 - 42635125
AN - SCOPUS:105047840638
SN - 0305-1048
VL - 54
JO - Nucleic Acids Research
JF - Nucleic Acids Research
IS - 16
M1 - gkag845
ER -