In defence of a logic for ‘because’

B. Schnieder

doi:10.1080/11663081.2016.1174360

In defence of a logic for ‘because’

B. Schnieder

Institut für Philosophie

Veröffentlichungen: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Peer Reviewed

Abstract

The present author developed a calculus for the logic of ‘because’. In a recent paper in this journal, it has been claimed that the central inference rules for the logic are invalid and that the intuition upon which the rules are based is not accounted for. This note criticises these arguments and presents an independent argument in favour of the rules used in the logic.

Originalsprache	Englisch
Seiten (von - bis)	160-171
Seitenumfang	12
Fachzeitschrift	Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics
Jahrgang	26
Ausgabenummer	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2016.1174360
Publikationsstatus	Veröffentlicht - 2 Apr. 2016

ÖFOS 2012

603113 Philosophie

Zugriff auf Dokument

10.1080/11663081.2016.1174360

Andere Dateien und Links

Verknüpfung zur Publikation in Scopus

Zitationsweisen

@article{ec3da205dde44821ae82fecd45f10889,

title = "In defence of a logic for {\textquoteleft}because{\textquoteright}",

abstract = "The present author developed a calculus for the logic of {\textquoteleft}because{\textquoteright}. In a recent paper in this journal, it has been claimed that the central inference rules for the logic are invalid and that the intuition upon which the rules are based is not accounted for. This note criticises these arguments and presents an independent argument in favour of the rules used in the logic.",

keywords = "Because, logic of grounding, truth-functional connectives",

author = "B. Schnieder",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor \& Francis Group.",

year = "2016",

month = apr,

day = "2",

doi = "10.1080/11663081.2016.1174360",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "160--171",

journal = "Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics",

issn = "1166-3081",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In defence of a logic for ‘because’

AU - Schnieder, B.

PY - 2016/4/2

Y1 - 2016/4/2

N2 - The present author developed a calculus for the logic of ‘because’. In a recent paper in this journal, it has been claimed that the central inference rules for the logic are invalid and that the intuition upon which the rules are based is not accounted for. This note criticises these arguments and presents an independent argument in favour of the rules used in the logic.

AB - The present author developed a calculus for the logic of ‘because’. In a recent paper in this journal, it has been claimed that the central inference rules for the logic are invalid and that the intuition upon which the rules are based is not accounted for. This note criticises these arguments and presents an independent argument in favour of the rules used in the logic.

KW - Because

KW - logic of grounding

KW - truth-functional connectives

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84980009889

U2 - 10.1080/11663081.2016.1174360

DO - 10.1080/11663081.2016.1174360

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84980009889

SN - 1166-3081

VL - 26

SP - 160

EP - 171

JO - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics

JF - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics

IS - 2

ER -

In defence of a logic for ‘because’

Abstract

ÖFOS 2012

Zugriff auf Dokument

Andere Dateien und Links

Fingerprint

Zitationsweisen