TY - JOUR
T1 - Increasing returns and cycles in fishing
AU - Liski, M
AU - Kort, Peter
AU - Novak, Andreas
N1 - DOI: 10.1016/S0928-7655(01)00038-0
Affiliations: Helsinki School of Economics, P.O. Box 1210, 00101 Helsinki, Finland; Department of Econometrics and Center, Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands; Department of Statistics and Decision Support Systems, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria
Adressen: Liski, M.; Helsinki School of Economics; PO Box 1210 Helsinki 00101, Finland; email: [email protected]
Source-File: 379Scopus.csv
Import aus Scopus: 2-s2.0-0035396909
Importdatum: 27.08.2007 08:22:29
22.10.2007: Datenanforderung 1927 (Import Sachbearbeiter)
07.11.2007: Datenanforderung 1977 (Import Sachbearbeiter)
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - We consider optimal fishery management under the assumption of increasing returns that is supported by previous empirical evidence. We improve the tractability and realism of the previous approaches by introducing flow adjustment costs on changes in harvest rate. Our framework is the first to provide a link between stable limit cycle policies and increasing returns in harvesting. The type of the harvest policy depends on flow adjustment costs: for relatively costly adjustments the usual steady state harvest policy is conceivable, whereas for relatively cheap adjustments the harvest policy is cyclical. We also show a connection between chattering control policies and limit cycles, which helps us to develop a clear economic meaning for cyclical harvesting. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
AB - We consider optimal fishery management under the assumption of increasing returns that is supported by previous empirical evidence. We improve the tractability and realism of the previous approaches by introducing flow adjustment costs on changes in harvest rate. Our framework is the first to provide a link between stable limit cycle policies and increasing returns in harvesting. The type of the harvest policy depends on flow adjustment costs: for relatively costly adjustments the usual steady state harvest policy is conceivable, whereas for relatively cheap adjustments the harvest policy is cyclical. We also show a connection between chattering control policies and limit cycles, which helps us to develop a clear economic meaning for cyclical harvesting. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
M3 - Article
VL - 23
SP - 241
EP - 258
JO - Resource and Energy Economics
JF - Resource and Energy Economics
SN - 0928-7655
IS - 3
ER -