Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Institutional rearrangements in the north Luangwa ecosystem: Implications of a shift to community based natural resource management for equity in protected area governance

Veröffentlichungen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelPeer Reviewed

Abstract

Community Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) is presented as an equitable approach, particularly relative to strict types of Area-based conservation. In Zambia, traditional and formal, contemporary institutions were combined to leverage CBNRM for natural resource management. We investigate whether and how this shift in conservation approach and interaction between institutions works in practice, and to what extent it produces more equitable governance processes. We identified 30 key informants from NGOs and government departments via snowball sampling. We conducted 20 focus group discussions involving local community participants in three Game Management Areas (GMAs) adjacent to North Luangwa National Park. Focus groups were divided by age and gender to minimize any potential influence of unequal power relations. Data collection included informal discussions with individual community members and participant observation. We found that the customary roles held by chiefs gave them relative power over the Community resources board and made them gatekeepers for NGOs and government institutions. Instead of fostering community participation and empowerment, new CBNRM institutions have had the unintended consequence of increasing the customary chiefs’ power through commercialization and bureaucratization of their positions. Rather than reinforcing local and indigenous institutions CBNRM has become a vehicle through which governments and NGOs centralize power and manufacture consent while weakening traditional institutions and reproducing existing patterns of inequity. This research provides unique insights into the workings of a CBNRM institution that is a hybrid between traditional (socially embedded) and Government (bureaucratic) institutions. We recommend that rather than simply setting up idealized institutions as a means to devolve power and enhance equity, the realisation of effective local participation and representation in CBNRM projects requires careful assessment of cultural contexts, local institutions and power dynamics.
OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummere33549
Seitenumfang12
FachzeitschriftHeliyon
Jahrgang10
Ausgabenummer13
Frühes Online-Datum24 Juni 2024
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 15 Juli 2024

Fördermittel

Special thanks go to the Community members and key informants in and around the North Luangwa Ecosystem without whom this work would not have been possible. We also wish to thank Dennis Musonda, Chola Makama, Elder Ngulube and Leah Chilengwe for their assistance in data collection and translation. Thanks to Twakundine Simpamba and Dr. Dula Wakassa Duguma for assistance with maps of the study area. Finally, thanks go to the Robert Bosche Foundation GmbH for funding the project \u201CWildlife, Values, Justice\u201D. In addition to traditional institutions' influence, NGOs were perceived to have a significant role in decision-making processes. Stakeholders acknowledged that NGOs held sway due to their funding capabilities as one respondent put it that \u201Cpeople use money to wield power. So, they have influence over everybody else. So, I can't say FZS doesn't have influence over certain decisions. if we look at the local level, do you think a warden or ranger will disagree with FZS? The answer is no.\u201D [KR 04]. This had the potential to weaken long-term development of local capacities for conservation. While NGOs and donors often perceived interventions as participatory and in line with local needs, government staff and local communities were aware that their success was dependent on aligning with NGO and donor objectives. One example was the implementation of a global heath program funded by USAID. It was described by one respondent as \u201Ca fortuitous arrival worth 10 million dollars. It wasn't really driven by the donors because it was the work we would like to do in the area, but, no one ever went to the local constituents beforehand and asked the questions \"What are really your needs? What are your desires? What are your wants? What we have been trying to do is to some extent retrofit and get consent to try and hopefully end up with a convergence from the constituents [KR 05] Thus the project success was judged based on predefined targets set by outsiders with some sort of consultative process that retroactively included communities after decisions had been made. Even if pre-set targets aligned with local communities\u2019 priorities, the fact that they had already been decided took agency away from local people. Further respondents indicated that receipt of further finances was largely contingent on implementing projects according to the donor or NGOs guidelines. Therefore, local people may find it difficult to go against interventions even when they went against their own interests. Special thanks go to the community members and key informants in and around the North Luangwa Ecosystem without whom this work would not have been possible. We also wish to thank Dennis Musonda, Chola Makama, Elder Ngulube and Leah Chilengwe for their assistance in data collection and translation. Thanks to Twakundine Simpamba and Dr. Dula Wakassa Duguma for assistance with maps of the study area. Finally, thanks go to the Robert Bosche foundation for funding the project \u201CWildlife, Values, Justice\u201D.

ÖFOS 2012

  • 106003 Biodiversitätsforschung
  • 509003 Entwicklungszusammenarbeit

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Institutional rearrangements in the north Luangwa ecosystem: Implications of a shift to community based natural resource management for equity in protected area governance“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitationsweisen