TY - JOUR
T1 - Interactive Digital Engagement With Visual Artworks and Cultural Artefacts Enhances User Aesthetic Experiences in the Laboratory and Museum
AU - Jonauskaite, Domicele
AU - Dael, Nele
AU - Baboulaz, Loïc
AU - Chèvre, Laetitia
AU - Cierny, Inez
AU - Ducimetière, Nicolas
AU - Fekete, Anna
AU - Gabioud, Pierre
AU - Leder, Helmut
AU - Vetterli, Martin
AU - Mohr, Christine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Digital technologies reshape the way we interact with our environment, including with artworks. Advanced computational imaging solutions allow having extremely high-resolution digital reproductions of artworks outside museums, presumably increasing artwork engagement. We tested whether exploring such reproductions via an interactive interface heightened aesthetic appreciation and enhanced recognition. With this interface, observers can move, turn, zoom, and relight the digital reproductions (http://artmyn.com/; https://osf.io/3srfw/). In Study 1, 82 participants explored paintings in the laboratory. In Study 2, 63 participants explored precious cultural artefacts in the museum. In both studies, participants’ aesthetic appreciation (interest, pleasure, intensity, subjective learning) was higher towards artworks they had explored interactively as compared to non-interactively or as physical objects, highlighting the advantage of the tested technology. However, we found no evidence that interactive exploration improved artwork recognition. More studies are needed to learn when and why digital interaction is beneficial above and beyond subjective aesthetic evaluations.
AB - Digital technologies reshape the way we interact with our environment, including with artworks. Advanced computational imaging solutions allow having extremely high-resolution digital reproductions of artworks outside museums, presumably increasing artwork engagement. We tested whether exploring such reproductions via an interactive interface heightened aesthetic appreciation and enhanced recognition. With this interface, observers can move, turn, zoom, and relight the digital reproductions (http://artmyn.com/; https://osf.io/3srfw/). In Study 1, 82 participants explored paintings in the laboratory. In Study 2, 63 participants explored precious cultural artefacts in the museum. In both studies, participants’ aesthetic appreciation (interest, pleasure, intensity, subjective learning) was higher towards artworks they had explored interactively as compared to non-interactively or as physical objects, highlighting the advantage of the tested technology. However, we found no evidence that interactive exploration improved artwork recognition. More studies are needed to learn when and why digital interaction is beneficial above and beyond subjective aesthetic evaluations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142924539&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10447318.2022.2143767
DO - 10.1080/10447318.2022.2143767
M3 - Article
SN - 1532-7590
VL - 40
SP - 1369
EP - 1382
JO - International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
JF - International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
IS - 6
ER -