Law Reviews, Open Metadata and RSS Feeds

Veröffentlichungen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelPeer Reviewed

Abstract

Most scientific publications have their metadata available as freely accessible and machine-readable information at CrossRef. However, student-edited law reviews have not followed suit with this practice. Consequently, a large part of legal research remains in a blind spot for scientometric analyses and tools. The present paper, by Andreas Nishikawa-Pacher, investigates whether the law reviews’ RSS feeds could serve as equivalent sources for open scholarly metadata. The suitability of RSS feeds from 51 student-edited law reviews (as indexed in Web of Science's Social Science Citation Index) was assessed with regards to three fictitious meta-scientific applications – namely (1) a ‘latest paper’-tool that lists the law reviews’ newest publications with links, abstracts and dates, (2) an author database and (3) a calculation of the mutual citation counts among different law reviews. This paper finds that only 21 law reviews offer functional RSS feeds, and while they were suitable for a basic ‘latest papers’-tool, due to their low metadata quality they cannot aid in generating an author database or in counting the mutual citations among law reviews. The result suggests that law reviews would be advised to adopt digital object identifiers (DOIs) and start depositing openly accessible metadata, for otherwise their scholarly impact and visibility will further decline.
OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)156-165
Seitenumfang9
FachzeitschriftLegal Information Management
Jahrgang22
Ausgabenummer3
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 28 Nov. 2022

ÖFOS 2012

  • 505015 Rechtsinformatik
  • 508003 Bibliothekswissenschaft

Zitationsweisen