Abstract
Background
The quality of life (QoL) of people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities (ID) is a key indicator of their well-being and the planning of care services. The precise and reliable assessment of QoL in this population is challenging due to methodological difficulties. Thus, adapted and validated instruments are urgently needed.
Objective
The goal for this study was the development and administration of a theory-based questionnaire for the multidimensional assessment of QoL in individuals with severe ID, which considers cognitive and communicative requirements and enables both self- and proxy-reporting.
Methods
Based on theoretical models and practical considerations, 22 items were formulated across five dimensions. Augmented with cognitively accessible design elements and two different response formats, the questionnaire was administered to 133 individuals from 15 residential settings.
Results
The developed questionnaire was found to be well applicable for the nuanced assessment of QoL in people with severe ID. High satisfaction was observed particularly in the social dimensions and in objectively perceivable emotional well-being. Lower satisfaction was recorded for subjectively perceivable emotional well-being. Notably, the areas of development and activity showed lowest satisfaction.
Conclusion
The findings of this study demonstrate that self-reporting is possible even for individuals with severe ID when appropriate methodological adaptations are applied. The questionnaire provides a valid foundation for assessing QoL and offers valuable insights for the evidence-based development of care services.
The quality of life (QoL) of people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities (ID) is a key indicator of their well-being and the planning of care services. The precise and reliable assessment of QoL in this population is challenging due to methodological difficulties. Thus, adapted and validated instruments are urgently needed.
Objective
The goal for this study was the development and administration of a theory-based questionnaire for the multidimensional assessment of QoL in individuals with severe ID, which considers cognitive and communicative requirements and enables both self- and proxy-reporting.
Methods
Based on theoretical models and practical considerations, 22 items were formulated across five dimensions. Augmented with cognitively accessible design elements and two different response formats, the questionnaire was administered to 133 individuals from 15 residential settings.
Results
The developed questionnaire was found to be well applicable for the nuanced assessment of QoL in people with severe ID. High satisfaction was observed particularly in the social dimensions and in objectively perceivable emotional well-being. Lower satisfaction was recorded for subjectively perceivable emotional well-being. Notably, the areas of development and activity showed lowest satisfaction.
Conclusion
The findings of this study demonstrate that self-reporting is possible even for individuals with severe ID when appropriate methodological adaptations are applied. The questionnaire provides a valid foundation for assessing QoL and offers valuable insights for the evidence-based development of care services.
| Titel in Übersetzung | Quality of life in people with severe intellectual disabilities: development and application of a questionnaire: development and application of a questionnaire |
|---|---|
| Originalsprache | Deutsch |
| Fachzeitschrift | Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 11 Aug. 2025 |
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
ÖFOS 2012
- 501010 Klinische Psychologie
Schlagwörter
- Assessment
- Inklusion
- Gesundheitspsychologie
- Wohlbefinden
- Selbstberichterstattung
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Lebensqualität bei Menschen mit schweren intellektuellen Beeinträchtigungen: Entwicklung und Anwendung eines Fragebogens“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitationsweisen
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver