Abstract
Apart from a specific set of conventions in book design, the so-called “género editorial”, the Castilian chivalric romances from the late 15th to the early 17th c., are a varied genre. The paper takes a look at different ways in which materiality plays a role for the romances, situating them between market strategy and complex literary tradition. Certain approaches, from paratextual keywords (‘mirror’, ‘chronicle’) to metanarrative and metafictional elements (found manuscripts, pseudotranslations, metalepsis) are not only fixed topoi, but vary from text to text. In fact, they are in constant dialogue with recent developments in historiography, as well as other fictional genres. Thus, supernatural sources, contradictory textual evidence, and explanations of the marvelous often combine into a complex discursive strategy that helps explain the continuous popularity of the genre for more than 120 years.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 379-392 |
| Seitenumfang | 14 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Neohelicon: acta comparationis litterarum universarum |
| Jahrgang | 47 |
| Ausgabenummer | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2020 |
ÖFOS 2012
- 602053 Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft
- 602042 Romanistik
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Material dimensions of a chivalric romance: metanarrative and book history in Ortunez de Calahorra's Espejo de principes y cavalleros and other libros de caballerias“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitationsweisen
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver