TY - JOUR
T1 - Mutual influences between native and non-native vowels in production: Evidence from short-term visual articulatory feedback training
AU - Kartushina, Natalia
AU - Hervais-Adelman, Alexis
AU - Frauenfelder, Ulrich Hans
AU - Golestani, Narly
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Authors.
PY - 2016/7
Y1 - 2016/7
N2 - We studied mutual influences between native and non-native vowel production during learning, i.e., before and after short-term visual articulatory feedback training with non-native sounds. Monolingual French speakers were trained to produce two non-native vowels: the Danish /ɔ/, which is similar to the French /o/, and the Russian /ɨ/, which is dissimilar from French vowels. We examined relationships between the production of French and non-native vowels before training, and the effects of training with non-native vowels on the production of French ones. We assessed for each participant the acoustic position and compactness of the trained vowels, and of the French /o/, /ø/, /y/ and /i/ vowels, which are acoustically closest to the trained vowels. Before training, the compactness of the French vowels was positively related to the accuracy and compactness in the production of non-native vowels. After training, French speakers’ accuracy and stability in the production of the two trained vowels improved on average by 19% and 37.5%, respectively. Interestingly, the production of native vowels was also affected by this learning process, with a drift towards non-native vowels. The amount of phonetic drift appears to depend on the degree of similarity between the native and non-native sounds.
AB - We studied mutual influences between native and non-native vowel production during learning, i.e., before and after short-term visual articulatory feedback training with non-native sounds. Monolingual French speakers were trained to produce two non-native vowels: the Danish /ɔ/, which is similar to the French /o/, and the Russian /ɨ/, which is dissimilar from French vowels. We examined relationships between the production of French and non-native vowels before training, and the effects of training with non-native vowels on the production of French ones. We assessed for each participant the acoustic position and compactness of the trained vowels, and of the French /o/, /ø/, /y/ and /i/ vowels, which are acoustically closest to the trained vowels. Before training, the compactness of the French vowels was positively related to the accuracy and compactness in the production of non-native vowels. After training, French speakers’ accuracy and stability in the production of the two trained vowels improved on average by 19% and 37.5%, respectively. Interestingly, the production of native vowels was also affected by this learning process, with a drift towards non-native vowels. The amount of phonetic drift appears to depend on the degree of similarity between the native and non-native sounds.
KW - Articulatory training
KW - DISCRIMINATION
KW - ENGLISH
KW - FOREIGN-LANGUAGE
KW - Individual differences
KW - Intra-speaker variability
KW - JAPANESE
KW - L1-L2 interactions
KW - L2
KW - L2 production
KW - PERCEPTION
KW - Production training
KW - SOUNDS
KW - SPEAKERS
KW - SPEECH
KW - Stability in production
KW - TALKER VARIABILITY
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969518377&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wocn.2016.05.001
DO - 10.1016/j.wocn.2016.05.001
M3 - Article
VL - 57
SP - 21
EP - 39
JO - Journal of Phonetics
JF - Journal of Phonetics
ER -