Offen gesagt: Beschwerden eines Archivars

Veröffentlichungen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelPeer Reviewed

Abstract

Disciplinary Open Access repositories differ from institutional ones in at least two important respects: the contributions they cover are restricted to an acade-mic field, but necessarily trans-local in scope. Some difficulties that have recently been impeding the Open Access Initiative carry particular weight as far as these repositories are concerned. Two issues in particular will be discussed by referring to examples ta-ken from a small philosophical repository Sammelpunkt. Firstly academic papers can (quite often in different versions and under various terms of use) increasingly be found in open as well as closed archives. Secondly, disciplinary repositories are overshadowed by the ubiquity of academic social web portals. One factor supporting these developments is the conceptual inadequacy of the catchphrase „Open Access“, which cannot prevent applications unintended by the initial inventors of this phrase.

Titel in ÜbersetzungSpeaking openly. Complaints of an archivist
OriginalspracheDeutsch
Seiten (von - bis)8-20
Seitenumfang13
FachzeitschriftMitteilungen der Vereinigung österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
Jahrgang71
Ausgabenummer1
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 19 Juli 2018

ÖFOS 2012

  • 603119 Sozialphilosophie

Schlagwörter

  • Disciplinary open access archives
  • Para-legal academic file sharing
  • Uncontrolled paper dissemination

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Offen gesagt: Beschwerden eines Archivars“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitationsweisen