Permanence as a Principle of Practice

Veröffentlichungen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelPeer Reviewed

Abstract

The paper discusses Peano's argument for preserving familiar notations. The argument reinforces the principle of permanence, articulated in the early 19th century by Peacock, then adjusted by Hankel and adopted by many others. Typically regarded as a principle of theoretical rationality, permanence was understood by Peano, following Mach, and against Schubert, as a principle of practical rationality. The paper considers how permanence, thus understood, was used in justifying Burali-Forti and Marcolongo's notation for vectorial calculus, and in rejecting Frege's logical notation, and closes by considering Hahn's revival of Peano's argument against Pringsheim's reading of permanence as a logically necessary principle.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)77-94
Seitenumfang18
FachzeitschriftHistoria Mathematica
Jahrgang54
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Feb. 2021

ÖFOS 2012

  • 101010 Geschichte der Mathematik
  • 603123 Wissenschaftsgeschichte

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Permanence as a Principle of Practice“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitationsweisen