TY - JOUR
T1 - Permanence as a Principle of Practice
AU - Toader, Iulian Danut
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - The paper discusses Peano's argument for preserving familiar notations. The argument reinforces the principle of permanence, articulated in the early 19th century by Peacock, then adjusted by Hankel and adopted by many others. Typically regarded as a principle of theoretical rationality, permanence was understood by Peano, following Mach, and against Schubert, as a principle of practical rationality. The paper considers how permanence, thus understood, was used in justifying Burali-Forti and Marcolongo's notation for vectorial calculus, and in rejecting Frege's logical notation, and closes by considering Hahn's revival of Peano's argument against Pringsheim's reading of permanence as a logically necessary principle.
AB - The paper discusses Peano's argument for preserving familiar notations. The argument reinforces the principle of permanence, articulated in the early 19th century by Peacock, then adjusted by Hankel and adopted by many others. Typically regarded as a principle of theoretical rationality, permanence was understood by Peano, following Mach, and against Schubert, as a principle of practical rationality. The paper considers how permanence, thus understood, was used in justifying Burali-Forti and Marcolongo's notation for vectorial calculus, and in rejecting Frege's logical notation, and closes by considering Hahn's revival of Peano's argument against Pringsheim's reading of permanence as a logically necessary principle.
KW - Burali-Forti and Marcolongo
KW - Notation
KW - Peano and Schubert
KW - Principle of permanence
KW - Pringsheim and Hahn
KW - Schroder and Frege
KW - Schröder and Frege
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85094170028
U2 - 10.1016/j.hm.2020.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.hm.2020.08.001
M3 - Article
SN - 0315-0860
VL - 54
SP - 77
EP - 94
JO - Historia Mathematica
JF - Historia Mathematica
ER -