Policies slow biological invasions in Europe, but legacies still matter

  • Quim Canelles
  • , Cristian Pérez-Granados
  • , Núria Roura-Pascual
  • , Dino Biancolini
  • , Tim M. Blackburn
  • , César Capinha
  • , Wayne Dawson
  • , Franz Essl
  • , Marina Golivets
  • , Benoit Guénard
  • , Cang Hui
  • , Jonathan M. Jeschke
  • , Ingolf Kühn
  • , Guillaume Latombe
  • , Bernd Lenzner
  • , Hanno Seebens
  • , Brian Leung

Veröffentlichungen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelPeer Reviewed

Abstract

Biological invasions are a main cause of biodiversity loss, prompting international agreements and national policies aimed at preventing and managing the introduction, establishment, spread, and impacts of alien species. However, whether these measures have effectively reduced invasions remains uncertain. In this study, we compared the absolute number of established alien species and changes in invasion rates, accounting for sampling effort and invasion timing, across European Union (EU) countries and the United Kingdom (UK) with the number and types of policies implemented. Policy effects were analyzed alongside other invasion drivers, including trade, climate, and geography. We demonstrate for the first time that invasive species policies within the EU and the UK had significant protective effects. Notably, these effects were evident only when examining changes in invasion rates, emphasizing the need to consider invasion dynamics and policy timing. These results should encourage countries to continue managing invasions and contribute to refining strategies for managing alien species.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer101355
FachzeitschriftOne Earth
Jahrgang8
Ausgabenummer9
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 19 Sept. 2025

Fördermittel

This research was funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND program, and with the funding organizations AEI (grant no. AEI PCI2018-092966 [N.R.-P. and C.P.-G.]) and BMBF (grant nos. 16LC1803A and 16LC1807B [J.M.J.] and 16LC1803A [M.G. and I.K.]). Q.C. acknowledges support from the Juan de la Cierva Program (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation – Juan de la Cierva, 2021), and C.H. acknowledges support from the the European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme (B3: Biodiversity Building Blocks for Policy; grant no. 101059592). This research was funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND program , and with the funding organizations AEI (grant no. AEI PCI2018-092966 [N.R.-P. and C.P.-G.]) and BMBF (grant nos. 16LC1803A and 16LC1807B [J.M.J.] and 16LC1803A [M.G. and I.K.]). Q.C. acknowledges support from the Juan de la Cierva Program ( Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation – Juan de la Cierva, 2021), and C.H. acknowledges support from the the European Union’s Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme (B3: Biodiversity Building Blocks for Policy; grant no. 101059592).

ÖFOS 2012

  • 106003 Biodiversitätsforschung

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Policies slow biological invasions in Europe, but legacies still matter“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitationsweisen