TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting overall mass transfer coefficients of CO2 capture into monoethanolamine in spray columns with hybrid machine learning
AU - Di Caprio, Ulderico
AU - Wu, Min
AU - Vermeire, Florence
AU - Van Gerven, Tom
AU - Hellinckx, Peter
AU - Waldherr, Steffen
AU - Kayahan, Emine
AU - Leblebici, M. Enis
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge funding from VLAIO-Catalisti Moonshot projects “Intensification of CO2 Capture Processes” (HBC.2019.0109 – CAPTIN and HBC.2021.0254 – CAPTIN2) and “Real-time data-assisted process development and production in chemical applications” (HBC.2020.2455 – DAP2CHEM). The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - In order to avoid the catastrophic effects of global warming, we need to reduce CO2 emissions. Currently, the most mature technology to reduce large industrial CO2 emissions is the absorption of CO2 into aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) solutions. The process is mostly studied in packed columns, for which many correlations have been offered to predict overall mass transfer coefficients (KGa). Spray columns are less prone to corrosion and were shown to enhance KGa. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no models to predict KGa in spray columns. Hybrid modelling tools, a combination of machine learning techniques and first-principle information, showed remarkable capabilities in modelling complex systems. In this work, we applied hybrid modelling techniques benchmarking performances of four regressors: Ridge regression, decision tree regressor (DTr), support vector machine regressor (SVMr) and fully connected artificial neural network (ANN). We compared the performances of these modelling techniques with a model developed using the Buckingham Π-theorem, which is the most used state of the art technique to model KGa based on dimensionless numbers. SVMr and DTr showed higher accuracies among the trained models on the test set. SVMr can predict KGa within 6.4% error on the test set, whereas the Buckingham modelling approach resulted in 83 % error. The use of machine learning techniques resulted in predictive models with higher accuracies compared to the Buckingham Π-theorem. Predicting KGa with a higher accuracy allows more control over operational parameters and better column designs.
AB - In order to avoid the catastrophic effects of global warming, we need to reduce CO2 emissions. Currently, the most mature technology to reduce large industrial CO2 emissions is the absorption of CO2 into aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) solutions. The process is mostly studied in packed columns, for which many correlations have been offered to predict overall mass transfer coefficients (KGa). Spray columns are less prone to corrosion and were shown to enhance KGa. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no models to predict KGa in spray columns. Hybrid modelling tools, a combination of machine learning techniques and first-principle information, showed remarkable capabilities in modelling complex systems. In this work, we applied hybrid modelling techniques benchmarking performances of four regressors: Ridge regression, decision tree regressor (DTr), support vector machine regressor (SVMr) and fully connected artificial neural network (ANN). We compared the performances of these modelling techniques with a model developed using the Buckingham Π-theorem, which is the most used state of the art technique to model KGa based on dimensionless numbers. SVMr and DTr showed higher accuracies among the trained models on the test set. SVMr can predict KGa within 6.4% error on the test set, whereas the Buckingham modelling approach resulted in 83 % error. The use of machine learning techniques resulted in predictive models with higher accuracies compared to the Buckingham Π-theorem. Predicting KGa with a higher accuracy allows more control over operational parameters and better column designs.
KW - CO capture
KW - Hybrid modelling
KW - Machine learning
KW - Process intensification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149854211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcou.2023.102452
DO - 10.1016/j.jcou.2023.102452
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85149854211
SN - 2212-9820
VL - 70
JO - Journal of CO2 Utilization
JF - Journal of CO2 Utilization
M1 - 102452
ER -