TY - JOUR
T1 - Testing the effects of kinship, reciprocity and dominance on prosocial food provisioning in azure-winged magpies (Cyanopica cyana), carrion crows (Corvus corone) and common ravens (C. corax)
AU - Horn, Lisa
AU - Bugnyar, Thomas
AU - Massen, Jorg J.M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF; P26806 to J.J.M.M.; Y366‐B17 to T.B.) and the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF; CS11‐008 to T.B.). Writing of the manuscript was supported by the FWF (V‐893 to L.H.). We thank Clara Scheer, Selina Schöndorfer, Christiane Rössler and Sarah Vlasitz for their help with data collection and coding, András Péter for constructing the apparatuses, the animal care staff at both research facilities, and Nadja Kavcik‐Graumann for creating the drawing in Figure 1 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Ethology published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Prosocial behaviour (i.e. benefitting others without receiving a direct gain) has long been perceived as an evolutionary puzzle but is nevertheless relatively common among non-human animals. Prosocial food provisioning has recently been documented in several large-brained bird species, such as corvids and parrots. Yet, to date, little is known about which factors influence food provisioning in these species. Here, we investigated whether kinship, reciprocity and dominance affected food provisioning in the group service paradigm in three corvid species, namely azure-winged magpies (Cyanopica cyana), carrion crows (Corvus corone) and common ravens (C. corax). In this paradigm, the subjects are tested in their regular social groups and can choose to make food available to their group members by landing on a simple seesaw apparatus. We found no evidence for an effect of kinship or reciprocity on food provisioning. Contrary to our predictions, the subjects' dominance was not positively correlated with their rate of food provisioning in any species. Among ravens, dominance was instead positively correlated with receiving food. We conclude that preferential provisioning for kin and direct reciprocity might have been impeded by the provider's inability to control who receives the food in the group service paradigm, but that our findings provide another piece of evidence that dominance is a highly important factor in the social interactions of common ravens.
AB - Prosocial behaviour (i.e. benefitting others without receiving a direct gain) has long been perceived as an evolutionary puzzle but is nevertheless relatively common among non-human animals. Prosocial food provisioning has recently been documented in several large-brained bird species, such as corvids and parrots. Yet, to date, little is known about which factors influence food provisioning in these species. Here, we investigated whether kinship, reciprocity and dominance affected food provisioning in the group service paradigm in three corvid species, namely azure-winged magpies (Cyanopica cyana), carrion crows (Corvus corone) and common ravens (C. corax). In this paradigm, the subjects are tested in their regular social groups and can choose to make food available to their group members by landing on a simple seesaw apparatus. We found no evidence for an effect of kinship or reciprocity on food provisioning. Contrary to our predictions, the subjects' dominance was not positively correlated with their rate of food provisioning in any species. Among ravens, dominance was instead positively correlated with receiving food. We conclude that preferential provisioning for kin and direct reciprocity might have been impeded by the provider's inability to control who receives the food in the group service paradigm, but that our findings provide another piece of evidence that dominance is a highly important factor in the social interactions of common ravens.
KW - comparative research
KW - cooperation
KW - corvid
KW - group service paradigm
KW - prosociality
KW - social relationships
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175643804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/eth.13420
DO - 10.1111/eth.13420
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85175643804
VL - 130
JO - Ethology
JF - Ethology
SN - 0179-1613
IS - 4
M1 - e13420
ER -