The process of replication target selection in psychology: What to consider?

Merle-Marie Pittelkow, Sarahanne M. Field, Peder M. Isager, Anna E. van´t Veer, Thomas Anderson, Scott N. Cole, Tomáš Dominik, Roger Giner-Sorolla, Sebahat Gok, Tom Heyman, Marc Jekel, Timothy J. Luke, David B. Mitchell, Rik Peels, Rosina Pendrous, Samuel Sarrazin, Jacob M. Schauer, Eva Specker, Ulrich Tran, Marek A. VrankaJelte M. Wicherts, Naoto Yoshimura, Rolf A. Zwaan, Don van Ravenzwaaij

Veröffentlichungen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelPeer Reviewed

Abstract

Increased execution of replication studies contributes to the effort to restore credibility of empirical research. However, a second generation of problems arises: the number of potential replication targets is at a serious mismatch with available resources. Given limited resources, replication target selection should be well-justified, systematic and transparently communicated. At present the discussion on what to consider when selecting a replication target is limited to theoretical discussion, self-reported justifications and a few formalized suggestions. In this Registered Report, we proposed a study involving the scientific community to create a list of considerations for consultation when selecting a replication target in psychology. We employed a modified Delphi approach. First, we constructed a preliminary list of considerations. Second, we surveyed psychologists who previously selected a replication target with regards to their considerations. Third, we incorporated the results into the preliminary list of considerations and sent the updated list to a group of individuals knowledgeable about concerns regarding replication target selection. Over the course of several rounds, we established consensus regarding what to consider when selecting a replication target. The resulting checklist can be used for transparently communicating the rationale for selecting studies for replication.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer210586
FachzeitschriftThe Royal Society Open Science
Jahrgang10
Ausgabenummer2
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Feb. 2023

ÖFOS 2012

  • 101018 Statistik

Zitationsweisen