Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

The process of replication target selection in psychology: What to consider?

  • Merle-Marie Pittelkow
  • , Sarahanne M. Field
  • , Peder M. Isager
  • , Anna E. van´t Veer
  • , Thomas Anderson
  • , Scott N. Cole
  • , Tomáš Dominik
  • , Roger Giner-Sorolla
  • , Sebahat Gok
  • , Tom Heyman
  • , Marc Jekel
  • , Timothy J. Luke
  • , David B. Mitchell
  • , Rik Peels
  • , Rosina Pendrous
  • , Samuel Sarrazin
  • , Jacob M. Schauer
  • , Eva Specker
  • , Ulrich Tran
  • , Marek A. Vranka
  • Jelte M. Wicherts, Naoto Yoshimura, Rolf A. Zwaan, Don van Ravenzwaaij

Veröffentlichungen: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Peer Reviewed

Abstract

Increased execution of replication studies contributes to the effort to restore credibility of empirical research. However, a second generation of problems arises: the number of potential replication targets is at a serious mismatch with available resources. Given limited resources, replication target selection should be well-justified, systematic and transparently communicated. At present the discussion on what to consider when selecting a replication target is limited to theoretical discussion, self-reported justifications and a few formalized suggestions. In this Registered Report, we proposed a study involving the scientific community to create a list of considerations for consultation when selecting a replication target in psychology. We employed a modified Delphi approach. First, we constructed a preliminary list of considerations. Second, we surveyed psychologists who previously selected a replication target with regards to their considerations. Third, we incorporated the results into the preliminary list of considerations and sent the updated list to a group of individuals knowledgeable about concerns regarding replication target selection. Over the course of several rounds, we established consensus regarding what to consider when selecting a replication target. The resulting checklist can be used for transparently communicating the rationale for selecting studies for replication.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer210586
FachzeitschriftThe Royal Society Open Science
Jahrgang10
Ausgabenummer2
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Feb. 2023

ÖFOS 2012

  • 101018 Statistik

Zitationsweisen