Abstract
The article investigates the recent (2000-2019) mainland Chinese historiography on the Sinocentric tributary system of the Míng and Qīng periods (1368-1912). The theoretical approach of the article is based on Foucauldian discourse theory, as well as Chinese theoretical scholarship on the evolution of Chinese thought. Its methodology is primarily based on Reiner Keller's sociological discourse research method. The main body of the article is structured upon the major fields of argumentation of the discourse, identified by the author as "the validity of the term 'tributary system,'""the tributary system and pre-modern Chinese culture,""the tributary system and Míng-Qīng Chinese socio-economic history,"and "the tributary system and the regional political order."The article argues that the 'discursive struggle' in recent historiography on the tributary system is primarily a result of its contested interpretation and evaluation under current dominant framings of an ideal international order - one centred around the principles of national sovereignty and "win-win"economic cooperation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 149-176 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Vienna Journal of East Asian Studies |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 602045 Sinology
- 601023 Global history
Keywords
- discourse analysis
- East Asian history
- Ming China
- Qing China
- tributary system
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Discourse Analysis of Recent Mainland Chinese Historiography on the Sinocentric Tributary System of the Ming and Qing Dynasties (1368–1912)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver