Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A matter of the metric? Sugar content overestimation is less pronounced in sugar cubes versus grams

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

To make healthy food choices, consumers need to be aware of the sugar content of foods. Units act as an environmental cue that might influence sugar content estimation accuracy. The present study (1) tested whether estimations of sugar content are more accurate in sugar cubes vs grams, (2) compared accuracy of sugar content to estimations of the foods’ weight and energy content, and (3) investigated gender, education, and body mass index as potential correlates. A sample of 886 adults was randomly assigned to estimating the sugar content of 10 common foods in grams or cubes. Estimations of sugar content diverged considerably from actual values in both groups (0.22 ≤ Cohen's dsgrams ≤ 1.20; 0.20 ≤ Cohen's dscubes ≤ 1.10), but were more pronounced for sugar content estimations in grams in 7 out of 10 foods (ts ≥ 4.04, Ps < .001, Cohen's ds ≥ 0.14). Sugar content misestimation was somewhat more pronounced than misestimation of weight (0.05 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 1.43) and energy content (0.04 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 1.19). Relationships between sugar content misestimation and gender (0.00 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 0.33), education (–0.07 ≤ r ≤ 0.11), and body mass index (–0.08 ≤ r ≤ 0.06) were mostly negligible. Although sugar content estimations were somewhat more accurate in sugar cubes vs grams, estimation accuracy is generally low. In addition to promoting consumers’ knowledge through labeling and education, additional avenues for interventions might need to be explored for sizeable effects on food choices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-120
Number of pages10
JournalNutrition Research
Volume131
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Funding

This research was part of the SMARTACT project which was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant 01EL1420A, granted to Britta Renner & Harald Schupp). All research work related to the project SMARTACT was carried out at the University of Konstanz. LK has since moved to the University of Vienna and changed affiliation. The authors thank the \u201CKonstanz Life\u201D team for their valuable support in recruiting participants and collecting the data, in particular, Bettina Ott, Luka Johanna Debbeler, Ulla Gebert, Susanne Heinzelmann, Josianne Kollmann, Nadine Lages, Sophie Rein, Hermann Szymczak, Karoline Villinger, Tobias Volk, Deborah Wahl, and Katrin Ziesemer. Furthermore, the authors would like to acknowledge the support in recruiting participants from the rectorate and press office of the University of Konstanz, in particular, Kerstin Krieglstein, Julia Wandt and Maria Schorpp; the City of Konstanz, in particular, Ulrich Burchardt and Bernd Metzger; the Konstanz District Office, in particular, Harald Nops; and the S\u00FCdkurier, in particular, Kirsten Schl\u00FCter. This research was part of the SMARTACT project which was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant 01EL1420A , granted to Britta Renner & Harald Schupp). All research work related to the project SMARTACT was carried out at the University of Konstanz. LK has since moved to the University of Vienna and changed affiliation.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 501002 Applied psychology

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Food
  • Nutrients
  • Nutrition
  • Energy intake
  • Portion size
  • Perception

Cite this