Abstract
This two-wave panel survey puts five pathways (i.e., antisocial and prosocial personality, intergroup identity conflict, recent victimization experiences, social media habits) against each other to test their unique over-time relationship with digital hate perpetration. Using autoregressive structural equation modeling, psychopathy, need for social approval, and recent victimization emerged as universally relevant for both incivility and intolerance. Notably, recent victimization had the strongest link, highlighting that breaking victimization-perpetration cycles may be key in combating digital hate. Furthermore, Machiavellianism and social media habits selectively predicted online intolerance. All these generally and selectively relevant paths point toward distinct opportunities to reduce aggressive communication.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly |
| Early online date | 21 Apr 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 21 Apr 2026 |
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) as part of the ERC Advanced Grant project Digital Hate: Perpetrators, Audiences, and (Dis)Empowered Targets (DIGIHATE; Grant Agreement ID: 101055073).
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 508007 Communication science
Keywords
- digital hate
- perpetration
- intolerance
- hate speech
- incivility
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver