Angry tweets: How uncivil and intolerant elite communication affects political distrust and political participation intentions

Melanie Saumer (Corresponding author), Kateryna Maikovska, Ariadne Neureiter, Anastasia Cepelova, Hendrik van Scharrel, Jörg Matthes

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

Hostile speech by politicians is increasingly prevalent on social media, especially for regular social media users. However, studies that compare the effects of political incivility versus intolerance on recipients’ emotions, political distrust, and political participation intentions are lacking. Findings of an experimental study (N = 297) indicated that uncivil speech had no significant effect on young recipients’ negative emotions. In contrast, intolerant speech elicited negative emotions, which increased political distrust and political participation intentions. Further, we assumed that a female politician using incivility/intolerance elicits stronger emotional reactions than a male politician. However, effects appeared independent of the gender of the communicator. Implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
JournalJournal of Information Technology & Politics
Early online date6 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Dec 2024

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 508007 Communication science

Keywords

  • political distrust
  • Incivility
  • emotions
  • gender
  • intolerance
  • political participation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Angry tweets: How uncivil and intolerant elite communication affects political distrust and political participation intentions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this