Are the scope and nature of psychology properly understood? An examination of belief in myths of popular psychology among university students

Viren Swami, Ulrich S. Tran, Lisa Thorn, Ingo W. Nader, Laura von Nordheim, Jakob Pietschnig, Deborah Husbands, Martin Voracek

Publications: Contribution to bookChapterPeer Reviewed

Abstract

This study developed the Belief in Myths of Psychology Scale (BiMPS), a 50-item measure that consists of psychological myths and examined its psychometric properties in three studies. In Study 1, 774 students from Austria completed the BiMPS along with measures of superstitious beliefs, the Big Five personality factors, and interest in science. Results showed that an overall score computed from all 50 myths showed good internal consistency and facets of validity. In a sample of British university students, Study 2 showed that altering the anchoring of some items did not alter responses to the BiMPS. Finally, the results of Study 3 showed that enrolment on an introductory psychology module reduced belief in myths of psychology among a British university sample.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvances in Psychology Research
PublisherNova Science Publishers, Inc.
Pages9-32
Number of pages24
Volume101
ISBN (Electronic)9781634638739
ISBN (Print)9781634638609
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 501004 Differential psychology

Keywords

  • Big five factors
  • Myths
  • Pseudoscience
  • Psychology
  • Superstitions; science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are the scope and nature of psychology properly understood? An examination of belief in myths of popular psychology among university students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this