Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Association between suicide reporting in the media and suicide: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Thomas Niederkrotenthaler (Corresponding author)
  • , Marlies Braun
  • , Jane Pirkis
  • , Benedikt Till
  • , Steven Stack
  • , Mark Sinyor
  • , Ulrich Tran
  • , Martin Voracek
  • , Qijin Cheng
  • , Florian Arendt
  • , Sebastian Scherr
  • , Paul S. F. Yip
  • , Matthew J. Spittal

Publications: Contribution to journal › Article › Peer Reviewed

Abstract

Objective To examine the association between reporting on suicides, especially deaths of celebrities by suicide, and subsequent suicides in the general population.

Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources PubMed/Medline, PsychInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar, searched up to September 2019.

Review methods Studies were included if they compared at least one time point before and one time point after media reports on suicide; follow-up was two months or less; the outcome was death by suicide; and the media reports were about non-fictional suicides. Data from studies adopting an interrupted time series design, or single or multiple arm before and after comparisons, were reviewed.

Results 31 studies were identified and analysed, and 20 studies at moderate risk of bias were included in the main analyses. The risk of suicide increased by 13% in the period after the media reported a death of a celebrity by suicide (rate ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.18; 14 studies; median follow-up 28 days, range 7-60 days). When the suicide method used by the celebrity was reported, there was an associated 30% increase in deaths by the same method (rate ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.44; 11 studies; median follow-up 28 days, range 14-60 days). For general reporting of suicide, the rate ratio was 1.002 (0.997 to 1.008; five studies; median follow-up 1 day, range 1-8 days) for a one article increase in the number of reports on suicide. Heterogeneity was large and partially explained by celebrity and methodological factors. Enhanced funnel plots suggested some publication bias in the literature.

Conclusions Reporting of deaths of celebrities by suicide appears to have made a meaningful impact on total suicides in the general population. The effect was larger for increases by the same method as used by the celebrity. General reporting of suicide did not appear to be associated with suicide although associations for certain types of reporting cannot be excluded. The best available intervention at the population level to deal with the harmful effects of media reports is guidelines for responsible reporting. These guidelines should be more widely implemented and promoted, especially when reporting on deaths of celebrities by suicide.

Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019086559.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberm575
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume368
Early online date18 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 508007 Communication science
  • 508014 Journalism

Keywords

  • BIAS
  • CELEBRITY SUICIDE
  • COVERAGE
  • IDEATION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association between suicide reporting in the media and suicide: systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this