Abstract
Environmental social media influencers (SMIs)—or ‘greenfluencers’—nowadays receive considerable scholarly and public attention. Yet, SMIs' persuasive power compared to institutional sources like environmental nonprofit organizations (ENPOs) on social media remains uninvestigated. We address this gap with a pre-registered between-subjects experiment (N = 269) among 16-to-25-year-olds from Belgium using real SMIs and ENPOs. We find that both sources affect pro-environmental outcomes, but via different mechanisms and among different groups. ENPOs are perceived as more trustworthy, which translates to higher pro-environmental attitudes and behavior intentions. SMIs affect pro-environmental behavior intentions via wishful identification and perceived similarity—yet only among women with higher environmental concern. Both sources stimulate pro-environmental outcomes via perceptions of attainability. Finally, SMIs' effects on pro-environmental outcomes are not fully explained by these source perceptions, which points to the necessity to study additional mechanisms. Overall, our findings illuminate important boundary conditions and mechanisms of newfangled pro-environmental persuasion via social media.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 108478 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Computers in Human Behavior |
Volume | 162 |
Early online date | 19 Oct 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2025 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 508007 Communication science
Keywords
- Environment
- Environmental nonprofit organizations
- Experiment
- Social media influencers
- Youth