Abstract
Computational communication science is transitioning from an emerging to an established field within communication research, creating a need for proper guidelines and methodological standards. This forum gathers experienced computational communication science scholars to debate the merits and drawbacks of standardization and discuss the tension between innovation, rigor, and inclusion. The assembled perspectives review current standards for data collection, sharing, and documentation, offering best practices for future research. They argue that high standards and inclusive practices can coexist, enhancing creativity and accessibility. By adopting inclusive guidelines, the computational communication science community can welcome diverse scholars, foster innovation, and advance the field collectively.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 13-36 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 8 Dec 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2025 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 508007 Communication science
Keywords
- open science
- computational communication science
- meta science
- inclusive standards
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Between Innovation and Standardization: Best Practices and Inclusive Guidelines in Computational Communication Science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver