Between the individual and the collective: understanding the tensions of the interpretive inquiry. A response to Boswell and Corbett

Anna Pospech Durnova, Philippe Zittoun

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

This article reacts on the reflection of the impressionistic character of interpretive research, as opposed to the ‘systematic character’ by John Boswell and Jack Corbett. By returning to ‘intersubjectivity’, the key notion of interpretation that has substantially framed the analytical apparatus of interpretive inquiry, I show that both impressionism and system can and should be embraced in interpretive inquiry, because they mirror the tension between the individual and the collective dimensions of meaning production.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-245
Number of pages5
JournalCritical Policy Studies
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Apr 2015

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 506014 Comparative politics
  • 509 Other Social Sciences

Keywords

  • Interpretive Inquiry
  • Collective
  • Individual
  • emotions
  • intersubjectivity
  • interpretation
  • discourse

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Between the individual and the collective: understanding the tensions of the interpretive inquiry. A response to Boswell and Corbett'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this