Beyond Credibility: The Effects of Different Forms of Visual Disinformation

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

Deepfakes dominate discussions about manipulated videos, but other forms of visual disinformation are more prevalent and less understood. Moreover, deception is often assessed through measuring credibility, overlooking cognitive effects like misperceptions and attitude changes. To address these gaps, an online experiment (N = 802) examined visual disinformation’s effects on credibility, misperceptions, and perceptions of a politician. The study compared a deepfake (machine learning manipulation), a cheapfake (rudimentary manipulation), and a decontextualized video (false context), all portraying the same politician and false message. Despite low in credibility, the deepfake and cheapfake caused a misperception, with the deepfake harming perceptions of the politician.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1020 - 1043
JournalJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Volume102
Issue number4
Early online date30 Nov 2025
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 508020 Political communication
  • 508012 Media impact studies

Keywords

  • Deepfakes
  • visual disinformation

Cite this