Changing the intellectual climate

Noel Castree, William M. Adams, John Barry, Daniel Brockington, Bram Büscher, Esteve Corbera, David Demeritt, Rosaleen Duffy, Ulrike Felt, Kaja Neves, Peter Newell, Luigi Pellizzoni, Kate Rigby, Paul Robbins, Libby Robin, Doborah Bird Rose, Andrew Ross, David Schlosberg, Sverker Sörlin, Paige WestMark Whitehead, Brian Wynne

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

Calls for more broad-based, integrated, useful knowledge now abound in the world of global environmental change science. They evidence many scientists' desire to help humanity confront the momentous biophysical implications of its own actions. But they also reveal a limited conception of social science and virtually ignore the humanities. They thereby endorse a stunted conception of 'human dimensions' at a time when the challenges posed by global environmental change are increasing in magnitude, scale and scope. Here, we make the case for a richer conception predicated on broader intellectual engagement and identify some preconditions for its practical fulfilment. Interdisciplinary dialogue, we suggest, should engender plural representations of Earth's present and future that are reflective of divergent human values and aspirations. In turn, this might insure publics and decision-makers against overly narrow conceptions of what is possible and desirable as they consider the profound questions raised by global environmental change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)763-768
Number of pages6
JournalNature Climate Change
Volume4
Issue number9
Early online date27 Aug 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 509017 Social studies of science

Cite this