Abstract
The potential of city regions to frame spatial development is widely acknowledged, and lately increasingly supported by top-down policy interventions. This article investigates and compares national city-regional policies in Finland and Austria. Owing to differences in their administrative systems, planning traditions and political agendas, the two countries rely on a distinct set of policy interventions. Moreover, the article addresses city-regional policies originating from the European Union and discusses their overlap and complementarity with national initiatives. The three cases provide examples of regulatory, discursive and remunerative policy interventions, which either explicitly or implicitly support city-regional cooperation. The plurality of interventions confirms the understanding of city regions as soft spaces, in which there is no single ideal approach to governance and planning. Instead, city-regional cooperation can be understood as diverse and multi-layered processes, which might require a plurality of policy responses.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-17 |
| Journal | Revue Belge de Géographie - Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Geografie (BELGEO) |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 24 May 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 507001 Applied geography
Keywords
- Austria
- City region
- Comparative framework
- Cooperation
- European Union
- Finland
- Soft space
- Spatial planning
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'City-regional policies in the planning systems of Finland and Austria: National initiatives and European opportunities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver