Abstract
Competition creates strategic incentives for firms to communicate private information about product quality through signalling rather than voluntary disclosure. In a duopoly where firms may disclose quality before setting prices and prices may signal quality, non-disclosure by all firms may often be the unique symmetric outcome even if disclosure cost vanishes. A high-quality firm may not disclose even if it has strong competitive advantage over a low-quality rival. This provides an alternative explanation of infrequent voluntary disclosure. Although product information is always communicated whether or not firms disclose, signalling distortions may provide a rationale for mandatory disclosure regulation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 86-114 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | The Economic Journal |
| Volume | 125 |
| Issue number | 582 |
| Early online date | 21 Mar 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2015 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 502047 Economic theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Competition, disclosure and signalling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver