Abstract
The well-known double marginalization problem understates the inefficiencies arising from vertical relations in consumer search markets where consumers are uninformed about the wholesale prices charged by manufacturers to retailers. Consumer search provides a monopoly manufacturer with an additional incentive to increase its price, worsening the double marginalization problem and lowering the manufacturer's profits. Nevertheless, manufacturers in more competitive wholesale markets may not have an incentive to reveal their prices to consumers. We show that retail prices decrease in search cost, and so both industry profits and consumer surplus increase in search cost. (JEL D11, D42, D83, L12, L25, L60, L81).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1683-1710 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | The American Economic Review (Print Edition) |
| Volume | 105 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2015 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 502047 Economic theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Consumer search and double marginalization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Working paper
-
Consumer search and double marginalization
Janssen, M. & Shelegia, S., 2015, 36 p. (Vienna Economics Papers; No. No. 1503).Publications: Working paper
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver