Defining key concepts for mental state attribution

François Quesque, Ian Apperly, Renée Baillargeon, Simon Baron-Cohen, Cristina Becchio, Harold Bekkering, Daniel Bernstein, Maxime Bertoux, Geoffrey Bird, Henryk Bukowski, Pascal Burgmer, Peter Carruthers, Caroline Catmur, Isabel Dziobek, Nicholas Epley, Thorsten Michael Erle, Chris Frith, Uta Frith, Carl Michael Galang, Vittorio GalleseDelphine Grynberg, Francesca Happé, Masahiro Hirai, Sara D Hodges, Philipp Kanske, Mariska Kret, Claus Lamm, Jean Louis Nandrino, Sukhvinder Obhi, Sally Olderbak, Josef Perner, Yves Rossetti, Dana Schneider, Matthias Schurz, Tobias Schuwerk, Natalie Sebanz, Simone Shamay-Tsoory, Giorgia Silani, Shannon Spaulding, Andrew R Todd, Evan Westra, Dan Zahavi, Marcel Brass

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

The terminology used in discussions on mental state attribution is extensive and lacks consistency. In the current paper, experts from various disciplines collaborate to introduce a shared set of concepts and make recommendations regarding future use.

Original languageEnglish
Article number29
JournalCommunications Psychology
Volume2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Apr 2024

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 501011 Cognitive psychology

Cite this