Abstract
In the last two decades, communication research dedicated substantial attention to the effects of incidental exposure (IE) to political information. In this meta-analysis, we analyzed the relationship of IE and five outcomes relevant for democracies. Including 106 distinct samples with more than 100,000 respondents, we observed positive cross-sectional relationships between IE and news use, political knowledge, political participation, expressive engagement, and political discussion. These effects shrink substantially but remain significant for panel studies. While we found a stronger relationship with knowledge for experiments compared to surveys, the relationship between IE and discussion and participation was not significant for experiments. Overall, findings suggest that IE matters, but its effects are smaller and more nuanced than previously thought. Also, the effects of IE are strongest when there is congruence between the exposure setting and the outcome setting. We discuss theoretical and methodological implications for IE research and the field at large.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 345-373 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Journal of Communication |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 17 Mar 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2022 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 508007 Communication science
Keywords
- Incidental Exposure
- Meta-Analysis
- News Use
- Political Discussion
- Political Knowledge
- Political Participation
- Political Expression
- NEWS EXPOSURE
- SOCIAL MEDIA
- LEARNING POLITICS
- COMMUNICATION
- INTERNET
- MODEL
- ENGAGEMENT
- ONLINE
- ISSUE
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Democratic consequences of incidental exposure to political information: A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver