TY - JOUR
T1 - Did tool-use evolve with enhanced physical cognitive abilities?
AU - Teschke, Irmgard
AU - Wascher, C.A.F.
AU - Scriba, M.F.
AU - von Bayern, A.M.P.
AU - Huml, V.
AU - Siemers, B.
AU - Tebbich, Sabine
PY - 2013/1/1
Y1 - 2013/1/1
N2 - The use and manufacture of tools have been considered to be cognitively demanding and thus a possible driving factor in the evolution of intelligence. In this study,we tested the hypothesis that enhanced physical cognitive abilities evolved in conjunction with the use of tools, by comparing the performance of naturally tool-using and non-tool-using species in a suite of physical and general learning tasks. We predicted that the habitually tool-using species, New Caledonian crows and Galápagos woodpecker finches, should outperform their non-tool-using relatives, the small tree finches and the carrion crows in a physical problembut not in general learning tasks. We only found a divergence in the predicted direction for corvids. That only one of our comparisons supports the predictions under this hypothesis might be attributable to different complexities of tool-use in the two tool-using species. A critical evaluation is offered of the conceptual andmethodological problems inherent in comparative studies on tool-related cognitive abilities.
AB - The use and manufacture of tools have been considered to be cognitively demanding and thus a possible driving factor in the evolution of intelligence. In this study,we tested the hypothesis that enhanced physical cognitive abilities evolved in conjunction with the use of tools, by comparing the performance of naturally tool-using and non-tool-using species in a suite of physical and general learning tasks. We predicted that the habitually tool-using species, New Caledonian crows and Galápagos woodpecker finches, should outperform their non-tool-using relatives, the small tree finches and the carrion crows in a physical problembut not in general learning tasks. We only found a divergence in the predicted direction for corvids. That only one of our comparisons supports the predictions under this hypothesis might be attributable to different complexities of tool-use in the two tool-using species. A critical evaluation is offered of the conceptual andmethodological problems inherent in comparative studies on tool-related cognitive abilities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84885233442&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2012.0418
DO - 10.1098/rstb.2012.0418
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84885233442
VL - 368
JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences
JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences
SN - 0962-8436
M1 - 1630
ER -