Abstract
How do authoritarian states respond to, and seek to defuse, popular protest? This study answers this question by developing the concept of discursive accommodation and tracing the co-evolution of contention and strategic elite communication in China. It reveals that the Chinese Communist Party leadership has responded to waves of intense unrest with increasing, yet not unconditional, sympathy for protesters. It argues that the rationale behind this response pattern has been first, to deflect discontent from the regime and, second, to temper local official and protester behavior. And yet, the unintended consequence of discursive accommodation may well have been the acceleration of mobilization. Investigating elite discourse provides an alternative angle to understand why contention in China has become endemic, but remains conspicuously moderate. It helps to unpack the one-party state’s ability of coexisting with considerable popular pressure and not be washed away by it, and managing protest without institutionalizing it.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 539-560 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | European Political Science Review |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2017 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 506014 Comparative politics
- 602045 Sinology
Keywords
- ACTIVISM
- AUTHORITARIANISM
- CRITICISM
- China
- INSTITUTIONS
- LEGITIMACY
- MOBILIZATION
- POLITICS
- POWER
- RESILIENCE
- STATE REPRESSION
- comparative authoritarianism
- contentious politics
- political communication
- protest
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Discursive Accommodation: Popular Protest and Strategic Elite Communication in China.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver