Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Does really one in ten believe capital punishment exists in a contemporary European Community country? An endorsed, prereviewed, preregistered replication study and meta-analysis

Publications: Contribution to journal › Article › Peer Reviewed

Abstract

Background: Till et al. (2016) reported that in an Austrian sample approximately one in ten respondents incorrectly believed that Austria still practices, or recently practiced, the death penalty, and that there is a positive association between the amount of weekly television viewing and this gross misperception of the Austrian justice system.

Methods: An endorsed, prereviewed, preregistered close (N = 597) served to test the veracity of these reported effects. This was coupled with the conceptual extension part, which (a) investigated the potential influence of watching American crime series, (b) accounted for further possible confounds, and (c) tested the generalizability of the effect of television viewing to online streaming.

Results: Online survey data (N = 597) replicated the one-in-ten prevalence of incorrect answers with the 5-item death penalty questionnaire used in the original study, but not, when asking directly about Austria's death penalty practices (prevalence: 0.3%). Younger age, but not the amount of television viewing or online streaming, suggestibility, or preferred TV genre consistently predicted incorrect answers in the death penalty questionnaire. Incorrect answers were Mokken-scalable (i.e., formed a common scale, complying with a non-parametric item response model) and were highly consistent. In contrast to the replication study results, a small meta-analysis of all available evidence (three studies, including the present replication) suggested that the aggregate effect of television viewing nominally was significant, albeit small.

Conclusion: The replication study yielded mixed results, which indicate the perception of a high prevalence of beliefs that there is capital punishment in a country without death penalty probably is due to a faultily designed questionnaire and thus a research artifact. Also, positive associations of television viewing with such beliefs likely are only small at best.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1601
Number of pages13
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jul 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 501021 Social psychology
  • 501004 Differential psychology

Keywords

  • MOKKEN SCALE ANALYSIS
  • Mokken scale
  • TELEVISION
  • close replication
  • conceptual replication
  • cultivation theory
  • death penalty
  • meta-analysis
  • preregistration
  • small-telescopes analysis
  • Small-telescopes analysis
  • Death penalty
  • Meta-analysis
  • Close replication
  • Conceptual replication
  • Cultivation theory
  • Preregistration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does really one in ten believe capital punishment exists in a contemporary European Community country? An endorsed, prereviewed, preregistered replication study and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this