TY - JOUR
T1 - Economic costs of invasive non-native species in urban areas
T2 - An underexplored financial drain
AU - Heringer, Gustavo
AU - Fernandez, Romina D.
AU - Bang, Alok
AU - Cordonnier, Marion
AU - Novoa, Ana
AU - Lenzner, Bernd
AU - Capinha, César
AU - Renault, David
AU - Roiz, David
AU - Moodley, Desika
AU - Tricarico, Elena
AU - Holenstein, Kathrin
AU - Kourantidou, Melina
AU - Kirichenko, Natalia I.
AU - Adelino, José Ricardo Pires
AU - Dimarco, Romina D.
AU - Bodey, Thomas W.
AU - Watari, Yuya
AU - Courchamp, Franck
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/3/20
Y1 - 2024/3/20
N2 - Urbanization is an important driver of global change associated with a set of environmental modifications that affect the introduction and distribution of invasive non-native species (species with populations transported by humans beyond their natural biogeographic range that established and are spreading in their introduced range; hereafter, invasive species). These species are recognized as a cause of large ecological and economic losses. Nevertheless, the economic impacts of these species in urban areas are still poorly understood. Here we present a synthesis of the reported economic costs of invasive species in urban areas using the global InvaCost database, and demonstrate that costs are likely underestimated. Sixty-one invasive species have been reported to cause a cumulative cost of US$ 326.7 billion in urban areas between 1965 and 2021 globally (average annual cost of US$ 5.7 billion). Class Insecta was responsible for >99 % of reported costs (US$ 324.4 billion), followed by Aves (US$ 1.4 billion), and Magnoliopsida (US$ 494 million). The reported costs were highly uneven with the sum of the five costliest species representing 80 % of reported costs. Most reported costs were a result of damage (77.3 %), principally impacting public and social welfare (77.9 %) and authorities-stakeholders (20.7 %), and were almost entirely in terrestrial environments (99.9 %). We found costs reported for 24 countries. Yet, there are 73 additional countries with no reported costs, but with occurrences of invasive species that have reported costs in other countries. Although covering a relatively small area of the Earth's surface, urban areas represent about 15 % of the total reported costs attributed to invasive species. These results highlight the conservative nature of the estimates and impacts, revealing important biases present in the evaluation and publication of reported data on costs. We emphasize the urgent need for more focused assessments of invasive species' economic impacts in urban areas.
AB - Urbanization is an important driver of global change associated with a set of environmental modifications that affect the introduction and distribution of invasive non-native species (species with populations transported by humans beyond their natural biogeographic range that established and are spreading in their introduced range; hereafter, invasive species). These species are recognized as a cause of large ecological and economic losses. Nevertheless, the economic impacts of these species in urban areas are still poorly understood. Here we present a synthesis of the reported economic costs of invasive species in urban areas using the global InvaCost database, and demonstrate that costs are likely underestimated. Sixty-one invasive species have been reported to cause a cumulative cost of US$ 326.7 billion in urban areas between 1965 and 2021 globally (average annual cost of US$ 5.7 billion). Class Insecta was responsible for >99 % of reported costs (US$ 324.4 billion), followed by Aves (US$ 1.4 billion), and Magnoliopsida (US$ 494 million). The reported costs were highly uneven with the sum of the five costliest species representing 80 % of reported costs. Most reported costs were a result of damage (77.3 %), principally impacting public and social welfare (77.9 %) and authorities-stakeholders (20.7 %), and were almost entirely in terrestrial environments (99.9 %). We found costs reported for 24 countries. Yet, there are 73 additional countries with no reported costs, but with occurrences of invasive species that have reported costs in other countries. Although covering a relatively small area of the Earth's surface, urban areas represent about 15 % of the total reported costs attributed to invasive species. These results highlight the conservative nature of the estimates and impacts, revealing important biases present in the evaluation and publication of reported data on costs. We emphasize the urgent need for more focused assessments of invasive species' economic impacts in urban areas.
KW - Anthropogenic activity
KW - Biological invasion
KW - Economic impact
KW - InvaCost
KW - Urban ecosystem
KW - Urbanization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184015785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170336
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170336
M3 - Article
C2 - 38280594
AN - SCOPUS:85184015785
VL - 917
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
SN - 0048-9697
M1 - 170336
ER -