TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of cloth face masks to prevent viral spread: A meta-analysis
AU - Zeilinger, Elisabeth Lucia
AU - Brunevskaya, Nadine
AU - Wurzer, Jana
AU - Oberleiter, Sandra
AU - Fries, Jonathan
AU - Fuchs, Amelie
AU - Herscovici, Alma
AU - Kum, Lea
AU - Masel, Eva Katharina
AU - Pietschnig, Jakob
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health.
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - Background The effectiveness of cloth face masks to prevent viral spread has not yet been conclusively established. In this meta-analysis, we evaluate their effectiveness in comparison to standard medical/surgical and N95-typed masks against viral spread. Methods We identified literature through a systematic search in three databases and meta-analytically synthesized relevant studies by means of random-effects as well as multilevel modelling. Results Twelve studies comprising k = 28 effect sizes (N = 338) were included. Medical/surgical and N95-typed masks outperformed cloth masks, yielding a large effect (g = 1.40). This effect remained robust when data were grouped according to comparisons with medical/surgical masks (g = 1.25) and N95-typed masks (g = 1.29). However, effects were differentiated according to mask fit, indicating reversals of signs when cloth mask effects were compared with ill-fitting medical/surgical and N95-typed masks (gs = −12.50 and − 10.90, respectively). Conclusions Cloth face masks were found to have significantly poorer filtering performance than medical/surgical masks and N95 masks, but only if non-cloth masks were properly fitted. Our results illustrate the necessity of using well-fitting medical/surgical or N95-typed masks to prevent viral spread, although some allowance should be made in circumstances where higher compliance with cloth mask mandates are expected.
AB - Background The effectiveness of cloth face masks to prevent viral spread has not yet been conclusively established. In this meta-analysis, we evaluate their effectiveness in comparison to standard medical/surgical and N95-typed masks against viral spread. Methods We identified literature through a systematic search in three databases and meta-analytically synthesized relevant studies by means of random-effects as well as multilevel modelling. Results Twelve studies comprising k = 28 effect sizes (N = 338) were included. Medical/surgical and N95-typed masks outperformed cloth masks, yielding a large effect (g = 1.40). This effect remained robust when data were grouped according to comparisons with medical/surgical masks (g = 1.25) and N95-typed masks (g = 1.29). However, effects were differentiated according to mask fit, indicating reversals of signs when cloth mask effects were compared with ill-fitting medical/surgical and N95-typed masks (gs = −12.50 and − 10.90, respectively). Conclusions Cloth face masks were found to have significantly poorer filtering performance than medical/surgical masks and N95 masks, but only if non-cloth masks were properly fitted. Our results illustrate the necessity of using well-fitting medical/surgical or N95-typed masks to prevent viral spread, although some allowance should be made in circumstances where higher compliance with cloth mask mandates are expected.
KW - COVID-19
KW - face masks
KW - filtration efficiency
KW - non-pharmaceutical intervention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186438046&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/pubmed/fdad205
DO - 10.1093/pubmed/fdad205
M3 - Article
SN - 1741-3842
VL - 46
SP - E84-E90
JO - Journal of Public Health
JF - Journal of Public Health
IS - 1
ER -