Europe's migration crisis: Local contact and out‐group hostility

Lukas Rudolph, Markus Wagner

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

Does a large influx of asylum seekers in the local community lead to a backlash in public opinion towards foreign populations? We assess the effects of asylum seeker presence using original survey and macro-level municipality data from Austria, exploiting exogenous elements of the placement of asylum seekers on the municipality level. Methodologically, we draw on entropy balancing for causal identification. Our findings are threefold. First, respondents in municipalities receiving asylum seekers report substantially higher exposure on average, but largely without the stronger contact that would allow for meaningful interaction. Second, hostility towards asylum seekers on average increased in areas that housed them. Third, this backlash spilt over: general attitudes towards Muslims and immigrants are less favourable in contexts with local asylum seeker presence, while vote intention for the main anti-immigration party is higher. Our findings go beyond existing work by examining contact directly as a mechanism, by showing a backlash effect in the medium term, and by focusing on a broad set of attitudinal and behavioural measures. Our results point to a need to design policy interventions that minimise citizen backlash against rapid migration inflows.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268-280
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Journal of Political Research
Volume61
Issue number1
Early online date2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 506014 Comparative politics

Keywords

  • ATTITUDES
  • EXPOSURE
  • IMMIGRATION
  • INTERGROUP CONTACT
  • PREJUDICE
  • REFUGEE CRISIS
  • SIZE
  • THREAT
  • asylum attitudes
  • backlash
  • contact theory
  • experiment
  • immigration attitudes
  • migration crisis
  • quasi&#8208

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Europe's migration crisis: Local contact and out‐group hostility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this