Exposing State Repression: Digital Discursive Contention by Chinese Protestors

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

One of the major issues in international development is how disadvantaged populations mobilize in response to state repression. Whether in the Black Lives Movement or in the 2011 Arab Spring, digital exposures of police abuse have spurred social movements when people took to social media to expose it. Yet, in authoritarian regimes, citizens cannot easily initiate or participate in social movements. In such cases, how do victims of police violence express their dissatisfaction? This study examines this question in contemporary China, where repression of protesters is well documented. Based on a dataset of microblogs—Chinese tweets—documenting 74,415 protest events in the early Xi administration (2013–2016), this study analyzes how ordinary protestors, including migrant workers, peasants, and the urban poor, expose police abuse in social media. A close reading of microblogs documenting 150 randomly sampled events finds that Chinese protestors adopt three distinct narrative types: citizenship, solidarity, and confrontational. An accompanying quantitative analysis of the wider dataset further finds that ordinary protestors frequently expose police abuse online and that mentions of police abuse are closely associated with the above three narratives. Overall, this study contributes to understanding how abused protestors discursively contest authorities in the world’s most powerful authoritarian regime.

Original languageEnglish
JournalStudies in Comparative International Development
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Aug 2024

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 506014 Comparative politics
  • 506003 Development policy
  • 508020 Political communication

Keywords

  • Protest
  • China
  • Social media
  • Citizenship
  • Contention
  • Repression

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exposing State Repression: Digital Discursive Contention by Chinese Protestors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this