TY - JOUR
T1 - GW100
T2 - A Plane Wave Perspective for Small Molecules
AU - Maggio, Emanuele
AU - Liu, Peitao
AU - van Setten, Michiel J.
AU - Kresse, Georg
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2017/2
Y1 - 2017/2
N2 - In a recent work, van Setten and co-workers have presented a carefully converged G(0)W(0) study of 100 closed shell molecules [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 5665-5687]. For two different codes they found excellent agreement to within a few 10 meV if identical Gaussian basis sets were used. We inspect the same set of molecules using the projector augmented wave method and the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP). For the ionization potential, the basis set extrapolated plane wave results agree very well with the Gaussian basis sets, often reaching better than 50 meV agreement. In order to achieve this agreement, we correct for finite basis set errors as well as errors introduced by periodically repeated images. For positive electron affinities differences between Gaussian basis sets and VASP are slightly larger. We attribute this to larger basis set extrapolation errors for the Gaussian basis sets. For quasi particle (QP) resonances above the vacuum level, differences between VASP and Gaussian basis sets are, however, found to be substantial. This is tentatively explained by insufficient basis set convergence of the Gaussian type orbital calculations as exemplified for selected test cases.
AB - In a recent work, van Setten and co-workers have presented a carefully converged G(0)W(0) study of 100 closed shell molecules [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 5665-5687]. For two different codes they found excellent agreement to within a few 10 meV if identical Gaussian basis sets were used. We inspect the same set of molecules using the projector augmented wave method and the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP). For the ionization potential, the basis set extrapolated plane wave results agree very well with the Gaussian basis sets, often reaching better than 50 meV agreement. In order to achieve this agreement, we correct for finite basis set errors as well as errors introduced by periodically repeated images. For positive electron affinities differences between Gaussian basis sets and VASP are slightly larger. We attribute this to larger basis set extrapolation errors for the Gaussian basis sets. For quasi particle (QP) resonances above the vacuum level, differences between VASP and Gaussian basis sets are, however, found to be substantial. This is tentatively explained by insufficient basis set convergence of the Gaussian type orbital calculations as exemplified for selected test cases.
KW - HE(II) PHOTOELECTRON-SPECTRA
KW - ELECTRON-IMPACT IONIZATION
KW - AB-INITIO CALCULATIONS
KW - ORGANIC-MOLECULES
KW - HIGH-RESOLUTION
KW - QUASI-PARTICLE
KW - ULTRAVIOLET PHOTOELECTRON
KW - MASS-SPECTROMETRY
KW - PENNING IONIZATION
KW - DIATOMIC HALOGENS
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85012930646
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01150
DO - 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01150
M3 - Article
SN - 1549-9618
VL - 13
SP - 635
EP - 648
JO - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
JF - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
IS - 2
ER -