Abstract
According to Stephens, Kemeny’s integrated rental markets have all disappeared on the level of nation-states. In his reply, the author draws attention to sub-national housing markets where cost rental principles continue to dominate within a city or region. Where local majorities and coalitions allow, the legal and institutional preconditions for integrated rental markets can be safeguarded and renewed. This includes various forms of land policy and rent control, and a large and experienced sector of cost-rental housing providers - public, non-profit and benevolent landlords alike. Urban/regional support for such housing policies seems to be on the rise, as a reaction to the massive increase in housing costs and affordability issues brought about by the ongoing financialization of housing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 562-566 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Housing, Theory and Society |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 12 Oct 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 506014 Comparative politics
- 502027 Political economy
Keywords
- welfare regimes
- housing regimes
- devolution f housing policy
- non-profit houisng
- cost rent
- devolution of housing policy
- non-profit housing associations
- Welfare regimes
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How and Where Non-profit Rental Markets Survive –: A Reply to Stephens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver