Abstract
Munich and Vienna are two similar cities, but they differ in only one respect: The principles underpinning their immigration policies. The proportion of foreign workers in Vienna would have risen much more sharply were it not that many of them opted for rapid naturalization and disappeared from the statistics. In Munich-because of the German concept of citizenship - naturalization is the last step in a long process of integration. National and urban policies influence housing segregation even more strongly than they affect the labour market. The formal exclusion of the foreign resident population clearly represents a problem of democratic policy. In linking social services, housing, and political participation to Austrian citizenship, Vienna contradicts to some extent the spirit of a meritocratic society in which social rank depends on achievement and social assistance is granted according to need.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Governing European Cities |
| Subtitle of host publication | Social Fragmentation, Social Exclusion and Urban |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis Inc. |
| Pages | 273-295 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781351737180 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781138735590 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 507002 Population geography
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Immigration to vienna and munich: Similarities and differences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver