Impact of the Assimilation of Surface Observations on Limited-Area Forecasts Over Complex Terrain

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

The article presents results from a computationally low-cost regional numerical weather prediction chain based on the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and its data assimilation (DA) suite WRFDA. Experiments with 24-h forecasts were performed twice daily (at 00 and 12 UTC) over a domain encompassing the European Alps and their surroundings with a 3.5 km grid spacing. The assimilation of surface observations with the 3D-Var algorithm improves near-surface temperature and humidity forecasts compared to control runs without assimilation. The forecast skill for near-surface variables is evaluated using independent surface observations. In the first six forecast hours, it is generally better in the assimilation experiments than in the control ones, with a mean error reduction of 0.26 K for temperature and 0.13 g kg−1 for specific humidity in the 00 UTC runs, and of 0.12 K for temperature and 0.18 g kg−1 for specific humidity in the 12 UTC runs. The assimilation reduces the standard deviation of the errors by a factor between 7% and 10% both for temperature and specific humidity. Verification with radiosonde measurements shows that assimilating surface observations increases the mean error in temperature and humidity forecasts within the planetary boundary layer (PBL), relative to the control. We show that the vertical structure of the adjustments to the model state resulting from DA (the analysis increments) is such that model biases are reduced near the surface but amplified higher up in the PBL. Finally, the assimilation of surface observations has a different impact on surface temperature forecasts in mountainous regions compared to adjacent plains. The error reduction is substantially higher in the plains than in the mountains, which likely depends on the inappropriate spreading of information along terrain-following model levels by the static covariances in 3D-Var. The relative accuracy of surface temperature forecasts in these two regions has a diurnal variability, with larger mean errors in the mountains during the day and in the plains at night.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70107
JournalMeteorological Applications
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2025

Funding

Funding: This work was supported by Hypermeteo S.r.l., Università degli Studi di Trento, European Union-NextGenerationEU, PNRR-PRIN2022, Grant code 2022NEWP4J, CUP E53D23004450006. This research was supported by the European Union - NextGenerationEU through the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR), PRIN 2022, Grant code: 2022NEWP4J, CUP E53D23004450006. Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible. Dino Zardi acknowledges the support by the strategic partnerships “Space It Up!”, which is funded by the Italian Space Agency and the Ministry of University and Research - Contract No. 2024-5-E.0 - CUP No. I53D24000060005 and “iNEST” (Interconnected Nord-Est Innovation Ecosystem) iinitiative, funded by the European Union under NextGenerationEU (PNRR, Mission 4.2, Investment 1.5, project no. ECS 00000043). We also thank Nicola Carlon (Radarmeteo S.r.l.), Tullio Degiacomi (Hypermeteo S.r.l.), and Lucia Cisco (Hypermeteo S.r.l.) for their valuable technical support in managing the numerical experiments. Open access publishing facilitated by Universita degli Studi di Trento, as part of the Wiley - CRUI-CARE agreement.

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 105206 Meteorology

Keywords

  • complex terrain
  • data assimilation
  • European Alps
  • surface observations
  • WRF model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of the Assimilation of Surface Observations on Limited-Area Forecasts Over Complex Terrain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this