Abstract
As conservation initiatives expand in response to biodiversity loss, there remains limited understanding about what forms of governance and roles for different actors produce the best ecological outcomes. Indig- enous peoples’ and local communities’ (IPs’ and LCs’) roles extend beyond participation to more equitable governance based on relative control and recognition of their values and institutions, but the relationship with conservation outcomes remains unclear. We review 648 empirical studies to develop a typology of IP and LC roles in governance and, for a subsample of 170, analyze relationships with reported ecological outcomes. The findings reveal that more equitable governance, based on equal partnership or primary control for IPs and LCs, are associated with significantly more positive ecological outcomes. This carries important impli- cations, including for actions toward the Global Biodiversity Framework targets, suggesting a need to elevate the role of IPs and LCs to conservation leaders while respecting their rights and customary institutions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1007-1021 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | One Earth |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 21 Jun 2024 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 107006 Nature conservation
- 106003 Biodiversity research
- 509003 Development cooperation
Keywords
- 30 × 30
- community-based natural resource management
- conservation effectiveness
- decolonize
- environmental justice
- equitable governance
- Kunming Montreal global biodiversity Framework
- participation
- protected areas
- rights-based approaches